Breath-Activated Inhaler Menu Control to Prevent Unintended Vaporization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electronic inhalation devices, such as e-cigarettes, lack user customization and safety features, as they typically require separate components for activation and menu navigation, which can lead to unintended vaporizer activation and limited user control over operational parameters.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a microprocessor with a pressure sensor that doubles as an input device, allowing users to enter a menu mode by distinct breathing actions, enabling configuration of operational parameters, such as vaporization settings and device calibration, while suspending normal mode functions for enhanced safety and user control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a separate button or switch is added for menu navigation, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemenu navigationVSAvoidcomponent count
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure sensor serves dual functions: detecting normal inhalation for vaporizer activation and detecting prolonged inhalation patterns for menu mode activation. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate input components while maintaining ease of operation through breath-based control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The device uses the user's own breath as the input mechanism for both normal operation and menu navigation. The breath itself serves as the control signal, eliminating the need for external buttons or switches and simplifying the device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Device complexity

If the pressure sensor is used for both inhalation detection and menu activation, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to potential unintended activation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent countVSAvoidactivation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts its response based on the duration of the detected breath. Normal brief inhalations trigger vaporizer activation, while prolonged inhalations exceeding a threshold duration trigger menu mode entry. This dynamic temporal discrimination ensures reliable function differentiation using a single pressure sensor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The computer distinguishes between different functions by monitoring the temporal parameter of breath duration. By setting a threshold duration, the system reliably differentiates between normal inhalation (shorter duration) and menu activation intent (prolonged duration), preventing unintended activation while using the same sensor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If normal mode function is suspended during menu mode, then safety is improved by preventing unintended vaporizer activation, but ease of operation worsens due to mode switching

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunintended vaporizer activationVSAvoidmode switching
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The normal vaporizer activation function is temporarily extracted or suspended during menu mode operation. This separation prevents unintended vaporizer activation while the user navigates menu options, enhancing safety. The function is restored upon exiting menu mode through prolonged inhalation or timeout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Adaptability or versatility

If customization options are added through menu mode, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational parameter configurationVSAvoidsoftware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The existing pressure sensor and computer are extended to provide menu navigation and parameter customization capabilities. By reusing existing hardware components for multiple functions (inhalation detection, menu activation, menu navigation), the patent achieves adaptability without proportionally increasing hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides users with customizable settings and enhanced safety by using a single pressure sensor for both inhalation and menu navigation, reducing component count and preventing unintended vaporizer activation, thus offering a more versatile and user-friendly electronic inhalation experience.

Implementation Method 1

Some electronic inhalation devices have a pressure sensor that activates when a user applies the suction force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure sensor detection:

Data Source

PatentUS11129418B2Electronic inhalation device with suspension function
Publication Date: 2021.09.28 NICOVENTURES TRADING LTD
  • US11129418B2 patent drawing
  • US11129418B2 patent drawing
  • US11129418B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic inhalation device comprising a power cell and a computer. The computer comprises a computer processor, a memory and an input-output means. The computer is configured in use to enter a menu mode when a user activates the menu mode.