Bridge Deck Deformation Sensor for Vehicle Weight Measurement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle weighing systems, particularly for heavy goods vehicles, face uncertainties due to factors like suspension movements, speed, and load transfers, leading to imprecise measurements and high costs, especially when integrated into bridge structures, which are also prone to damage and wear.

Innovation Solution

A method that uses sensors to measure the overall deformation of a bridge deck as a vehicle passes, calculating the vehicle's weight by integrating deformation values over time and comparing them to a pre-established scale calibrated with vehicles of known weights, avoiding the need to sum axle weights and reducing sensitivity to uncertainties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If sensors are placed very close to the bridge's rolling surface to measure axle weights, then measurement sensitivity is improved, but the device becomes expensive and sensitive to road surface wear and damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxle weight measurement precisionVSAvoidsensor integration complexity and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the measurement function from the road surface level and relocates it to the bridge superstructure level. Sensors are mounted on the bridge deck or girders to measure global deformation caused by vehicle passage, rather than placing sensors at the rolling surface to measure local axle loads. This extraction eliminates the need for road surface integration while maintaining measurement capability through global structural response monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the function of multiple axle weight measurements into a single global weight measurement. Instead of using multiple sensors to measure each axle separately and summing the results (which accumulates uncertainty and increases complexity), the system uses a single sensor to measure the total deformation caused by the entire vehicle, directly providing the gross weight without needing to resolve individual axle contributions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Loss of information

If multiple sensors are used to measure each axle weight separately, then detailed weight distribution information is obtained, but measurement uncertainty accumulates and device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight distribution informationVSAvoidtotal weight measurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple measurement functions into a single measurement. The single sensor captures the cumulative effect of all axles on the bridge structure, providing direct total weight information. This merging approach eliminates the accumulation of measurement uncertainties that would occur with multiple separate axle measurements, while still enabling gross weight determination without needing to resolve individual axle weight distributions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If sensors are integrated into the bridge construction, then structural monitoring is improved, but the system becomes sensitive to bridge wear and aging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural monitoring reliabilityVSAvoidroad surface wear and bridge aging
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by selecting specific locations on the bridge superstructure where deformation is most indicative of vehicle weight while being least affected by wear. Sensors are positioned on girders or deck elements that experience measurable deformation from vehicle loading but are not directly exposed to traffic wear, environmental degradation, or corrosion that affects the rolling surface and lower structural elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Device complexity

If a simple measurement method is used, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement system complexityVSAvoidvehicle weight measurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical measurement systems with a simplified sensor-based system. Instead of using multiple load cells or force sensors to directly measure axle forces, the system uses a single deformation sensor (such as a strain gauge or displacement sensor) to measure the bridge structure's response to vehicle loading. This substitution of the measurement principle simplifies the device while maintaining or improving precision through the use of calibrated deformation-weight relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method provides a simple, reliable, and precise measurement of vehicle weight by utilizing global deformation data, minimizing the impact of uncertainties and bridge wear, while also allowing for bridge monitoring and aging assessment.

Implementation Method 1

obtain values indicative of a parameter of the overall deformation of the deck at successive times of the passage of the vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation: Deformation

Data Source

PatentEP3966534B1Method for weighing a vehicle crossing a bridge
Publication Date: 2024.07.03 OSMOS SA
  • EP3966534B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3966534B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP3966534B1 patent drawingFigure 6

AI summary

A chronogram is obtained of a parameter indicative of the deformation of the deck (4) of a span (8) of the bridge (1) when a vehicle passes over it. A gross integral is obtained by integrating, in time, the value of the parameter during the time interval during which the deck is deformed by the vehicle. The time difference between the above-mentioned chronogram and a similar chronogram obtained by deformation sensors placed on an adjacent span (8a) provides information on the speed of the vehicle (7). A measurement of the total weight of the vehicle is obtained by multiplying the gross integral by the speed of the vehicle, in order to obtain a normed integral that is compared with a comparative scale previously obtained by calibration with vehicles of known weight.