Bridge Processing Machine Head with Integrated Gripping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bridge processing machines are complex, bulky, and prone to wear and faults due to the need for multiple independent moving members for gripping and processing, leading to slow operations and frequent positioning issues.

Innovation Solution

A head for a bridge processing machine is designed with integrated gripping means that rotate between operating and non-operative positions, allowing a single moving member to control both the tool and gripping means, reducing complexity and wear.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple independent moving members are used for gripping and processing, then the machine can perform both functions, but the machine becomes complex, bulky, and prone to wear and faults

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional capabilityVSAvoidmachine complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the gripping means and tool holder assembly into a single integrated head structure that rotates as one unit. The gripping means are mounted on the same rotating terminal as the tool holder, allowing both functions to be performed by a single moving member rather than requiring separate independent moving members for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The rotating terminal of the head serves multiple functions: it holds both the gripping means and the tool holder assembly, and its rotation enables both gripping operations and processing operations. This multi-functional design eliminates the need for separate dedicated moving members for each operation type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple independent moving members are used for gripping and processing, then both functions can be performed, but the machine is more bulky and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional capabilityVSAvoidmachine size
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the gripping means and tool holder assembly into a single integrated head structure that rotates as one unit. The gripping means are mounted on the same rotating terminal as the tool holder, allowing both functions to be performed by a single moving member rather than requiring separate independent moving members for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Device complexity

If gripping means are integrated with tool holder assembly and made rotatable, then a single moving member can control both, but the movement and processing operations become slow due to positioning time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine complexityVSAvoidoperation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a dynamically adjustable positioning system with sensors and actuators that can quickly and accurately position the rotating terminal at required locations. This dynamic positioning capability reduces the time penalty associated with rotation and maintains high operation speed despite the integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If the terminal is repeatedly moved with respect to the support portion for switching operating modes, then gripping and processing can be switched, but the duration and integrity of the terminal are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating mode switchingVSAvoidterminal integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a dynamically adjustable positioning system with sensors and actuators that can quickly and accurately position the rotating terminal at required locations. This dynamic positioning capability reduces the time penalty associated with rotation and maintains high operation speed despite the integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12208540B2Head for a bridge processing machine
Publication Date: 2025.01.28 BIESSE SPA
  • US12208540B2 patent drawing
  • US12208540B2 patent drawing
  • US12208540B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A head for a bridge processing machine includes a support having a frame loosely connected to a bridge and a shaft extending along a rotation axis and rotatable relative to the frame around the axis, a tool holder assembly supporting a tool to allow processing of an object by the tool and including first constraint means to integrally constrain the tool holder assembly and the shaft, gripping means including a base portion, a gripping device movable relative to the base portion, to define an operating position wherein it engages an object, and an inoperative position, and second constraint means to constrain idly the base portion and the shaft, wherein the gripping means and the tool holder assembly include interface means for blocking reciprocal rotation between the tool holder assembly and the base portion so that the tool holder assembly may drag the gripping means when rotated around the rotation axis.