Bridge Magnetic Inductor Offset Design for Parasitic Ringing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional magnetic devices in switching power converters face issues with size, efficiency, and mechanical robustness, as well as electromagnetic compatibility and parasitic ringing due to the placement of components under the inductor, which leads to increased losses and potential mechanical stress.

Innovation Solution

The use of a bridge inductor with a magnetic core offset from the substrate and a ground return conductor that serves as both a current path and a mechanical standoff, allowing components to be placed under the inductor while minimizing parasitic ringing and mechanical stress, and incorporating flexible stand-offs to accommodate substrate movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If components are placed under the inductor to minimize size, then device footprint is reduced, but parasitic ringing and electromagnetic compatibility issues increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice footprintVSAvoidparasitic ringing
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent moves components from the planar dimension (under the inductor on the substrate) to the vertical dimension (on top of the magnetic core), effectively utilizing the third dimension to resolve the contradiction between compact footprint and electromagnetic compatibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The magnetic core serves as an intermediary structure that physically separates the inductor from substrate components while providing a mounting platform, thereby reducing parasitic coupling and electromagnetic interference between components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Area of stationary object

If inductor is placed close to substrate to minimize size, then device footprint is reduced, but mechanical stress and reliability issues increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice footprintVSAvoidmechanical robustness
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By elevating the inductor assembly to the vertical dimension on top of the magnetic core, the design reduces mechanical stress on substrate traces and solder joints while maintaining compact overall footprint

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The magnetic core and its mounting structure serve as a mechanical buffer that absorbs and distributes thermal and mechanical stresses, protecting the substrate and solder joints from damage before stress can propagate to critical components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Object-generated harmful factors

If ground return conductor is added to reduce parasitic ringing, then electromagnetic compatibility improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparasitic ringingVSAvoidconductor arrangement
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic core structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides magnetic flux path for inductance, acts as a mechanical support platform for components, and serves as the mounting base for the ground return conductor, thereby reducing overall device complexity despite adding EMI protection capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces substrate conductor losses, enhances mechanical robustness, and improves electromagnetic compatibility, achieving higher efficiency and smaller size while protecting components from mechanical damage.

Implementation Method 1

a magnetic core disposed over and offset from a first portion of the outer surface of the substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

N windings wound around at least a portion of the magnetic core

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9281739B2Bridge magnetic devices and associated systems and methods
Publication Date: 2016.03.08 VOLTERRA SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
  • US9281739B2 patent drawing
  • US9281739B2 patent drawing
  • US9281739B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electrical assembly includes a substrate, a bridge magnetic device disposed on an outer surface of the substrate, and at least one electrical component. The bridge magnetic device includes (1) a magnetic core disposed over and offset from a first portion of the outer surface of the substrate, (2) N windings wound around at least a portion of the magnetic core and electrically coupled to conductors of the substrate, where N is an integer greater than zero, and (3) a ground return conductor disposed on an outer surface of the magnetic core facing the first portion of the outer surface of the substrate. The at least one electrical component is disposed on the first portion of the outer surface of the substrate.