Tunable Optical Device With Bridge-Meander Force Transmission

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tunable optical devices face challenges in controlling the actuation force direction to avoid parasitic influences on optical properties, requiring precise control to maintain desired optical performance.

Innovation Solution

A tunable optical device with a transmission element having specific mechanical properties, including a bridge portion and meander portion with defined stiffness ratios, minimizes parasitic influences by controlling the movement of optical components along the axial direction while allowing flexible electrical and thermal insulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a transmission element with high stiffness in axial direction is used to transmit actuation force, then the precision of optical property control is improved, but the complexity of the device structure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of optical property controlVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The transmission element is segmented into a bridge portion and a meander portion, each with distinct stiffness characteristics. The bridge portion provides high axial stiffness for precise force transmission, while the meander portion provides lateral compliance to eliminate parasitic influences. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high precision control without requiring a completely rigid complex structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the transmission element have different local mechanical properties. The bridge portion is designed with high stiffness in the axial direction for precise force transmission, while the meander portion is designed with high stiffness in lateral directions for compliance. This local differentiation of mechanical properties enables the system to achieve high precision control while maintaining structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If the ring member is displaced along the axial direction to adjust optical properties, then the optical property adjustment precision is improved, but parasitic movements in oblique directions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical property adjustment precisionVSAvoidparasitic movements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The transmission element acts as an intermediary between the actuator and the ring member. It transmits the actuation force along the axial direction while its meander portion absorbs or prevents parasitic movements in oblique directions. This intermediary structure allows precise axial displacement for optical property adjustment while filtering out harmful parasitic movements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The stiffness parameters of the transmission element are specifically designed to change with direction. The bridge portion has high stiffness in the axial direction to enable precise force transmission, while the meander portion has high stiffness in lateral directions to prevent parasitic movements. This directional parameter differentiation resolves the contradiction between precision adjustment and parasitic movement elimination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device achieves precise control of optical properties by reducing parasitic changes and thermal effects, ensuring high precision in optical adjustments.

Implementation Method 1

The actuator may be a voice coil actuator, a piezo-electric actuator, a shape-memory-alloy (SMA) actuator or a reluctance actuator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVoice coil actuator: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 2

The actuator may be a voice coil actuator, a piezo-electric actuator, a shape-memory-alloy (SMA) actuator or a reluctance actuator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezo-electric actuator: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 3

A stiffness of the meander portion in directions obliquely with respect to the axial direction is larger than the stiffness of the meander portion along the axial direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 4

A stiffness of the bridge portion along the axial direction is larger than a stiffness of the meander portion along the axial direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force transmission: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS12455405B2Tunable optical device
Publication Date: 2025.10.28 OPTOTUNE SWITZERLAND AG
  • US12455405B2 patent drawing
  • US12455405B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Tunable optical device comprising an actuator, a transmission element, a mount and an optical component, wherein the optical component comprises a window member and a ring member, wherein an optical property of the optical component is adjustable by altering the position of the ring member with respect to the window member. The actuator is arranged to generate an actuation force along an axial direction, the transmission element is arranged to transmit the actuation force from the actuator to the optical component, the transmitted actuation force alters the position of the ring member with respect to the window member. The transmission element comprises a bridge portion and a meander portion, wherein the bridge portion couples the ring member to the actuator and the window member is attached to the mount, or the bridge portion couples the window member to the actuator and the ring member is attached to the mount. The meander portion couples the bridge portion to the mount, and a stiffness of the bridge portion is larger than a stiffness of the meander portion along the axial direction, and a stiffness of the meander portion in directions obliquely with respect to the axial direction is larger than the stiffness of the meander portion along the axial direction.