Bridge Damage Detection via Strain Sensor Orthogonal Regression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for bridge damage detection are inefficient and costly, as they struggle to accurately determine damage location and severity, especially in deteriorating infrastructure where visual inspections become difficult and costly, and existing systems rely on vibration or pseudo-static characteristics that are not always feasible or effective over time.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system using strain sensor data, which collects and processes quasi-static strain data from bridges under ambient traffic loads, employing orthogonal regression and statistical Fshm values to isolate damage indicators between sensor pairs, allowing for the detection of bridge damage independent of bridge component responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If visual bridge inspection methods are used, then damage detection can be performed, but the inspection becomes more difficult and costly as infrastructure deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage detection capabilityVSAvoidinspection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional visual inspection methods with an automated sensor-based system that uses strain measurements and statistical analysis to detect bridge damage. This substitution eliminates the need for manual visual inspections, reducing complexity and cost while improving reliability through objective, quantifiable damage indicators derived from sensor data analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If existing damage detection systems are used, then damage can be detected, but the accuracy in determining damage location and severity is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage detection accuracyVSAvoiddamage location and severity determination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by developing damage indicators that are specifically tailored to local bridge conditions and sensor configurations. The statistical methods are customized for each bridge structure, creating localized damage assessment capabilities that improve both detection accuracy and measurement precision for specific bridge components and locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms raw strain sensor data into meaningful damage indicators through statistical parameter transformations. By changing the parameters from raw measurements to standardized damage indicators with known statistical properties, the system achieves higher accuracy in determining both damage presence and severity while maintaining precise location identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If vibration or pseudo-static characteristics are used for damage detection, then damage can be detected, but the method is not always feasible or effective over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage detection feasibilityVSAvoidlong-term effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous monitoring using strain sensors that operate indefinitely without interruption. The system continuously collects sensor data, updates statistical models, and generates damage indicators in real-time, ensuring long-term effectiveness and feasibility. This continuous operation allows the system to adapt to changing bridge conditions and maintain reliability over extended periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-calibration and adaptive learning by continuously updating its statistical models based on incoming sensor data. The damage indicators are self-adjusting to account for environmental variations and bridge behavior changes, eliminating the need for frequent manual recalibration or intervention and ensuring sustained long-term effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10139306B2Method and system for bridge damage detection
Publication Date: 2018.11.27 IOWA STATE UNIV RES FOUND INC
  • US10139306B2 patent drawing
  • US10139306B2 patent drawing
  • US10139306B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for bridge damage detection using, for example, one or more strain range methods are provided. One exemplary embodiment provides a computer-implemented methods and systems for determining bridge damage from strain sensor data, for example, by collecting a batch of strain data from one or more sensor pairs. From the batch of strain data one or more sets of strain data may be extracted comprising a quasi-static response of the bridge under ambient traffic loads. A relationship may be established between the one or more sets of strain data extracted from the one or more sensor pairs by orthogonal regression. Bridge damage may be detected by generally isolating a damage indicator between the one or more sensor pairs by monitoring changes in a statistical Fshm value over time.