Bridged Transaction Settlement Using AI Clearing Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The bridged transaction message system faces challenges such as premature settlement without a clearing message, leading to complex and time-consuming processes and potential financial losses due to currency exchange rate fluctuations.

Innovation Solution

A server system uses AI/ML models to generate a clearing score based on transaction and historical data, determining whether to hold or initiate settlement, thereby optimizing transaction processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If settlement is performed in the bridged transaction message system without verifying clearing message receipt, then transaction processing speed is improved, but financial loss increases due to premature settlement of uncleared transactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction processing speedVSAvoidfinancial loss
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of clearing probability using AI/ML models before executing settlement. The clearing prediction model evaluates transaction features and historical data to predict whether a clearing message will be received, and only settlements with high clearing probability are processed, preventing premature settlement losses while maintaining efficient processing for valid transactions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the bridged transaction system implements strict clearing verification before settlement, then financial accuracy is improved, but processing time increases due to complex error handling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefinancial accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of clearing probability using AI/ML models before executing settlement. The clearing prediction model evaluates transaction features and historical data to predict whether a clearing message will be received, and only settlements with high clearing probability are processed, preventing premature settlement losses while maintaining efficient processing for valid transactions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces traditional rule-based error handling mechanisms with AI/ML-based clearing prediction models. Instead of complex if-then logic and manual error processing, the system uses machine learning algorithms to automatically assess clearing probability and make intelligent settlement decisions, reducing processing time while maintaining high accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If AI/ML clearing prediction models are implemented in the bridged transaction system, then settlement accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclearing score accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary clearing prediction service layer between the transaction processing system and the settlement execution system. This intermediary service contains the AI/ML models that assess clearing probability, allowing the core transaction system to remain simple while gaining intelligent prediction capabilities through the mediator layer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250378441A1Method and system for intelligently settling bridged transactions
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 MASTERCARD INT INC
  • US20250378441A1 patent drawing
  • US20250378441A1 patent drawing
  • US20250378441A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for intelligently settling bridged transactions are disclosed. The method performed by a server system includes receiving a payment authorization message associated with an ongoing payment transaction from an issuer server. Here, the ongoing payment transaction is a bridged transaction with the issuer server operating in a single message system and an acquirer server operating in a dual message system. Method includes extracting a transaction feature set from the ongoing payment transaction and accessing a historical trend feature set from a database. Method includes generating, by one or more clearing prediction models associated with the server system, a clearing score for the ongoing payment transaction based, at least in part, on the transaction feature set and the historical trend feature set. Method includes transmitting a hold transaction message to the issuer server based, at least in part, on the clearing score being lower than a predefined threshold.