Broadcast Modulation for Persistent Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In cellular communication systems, downlink broadcasting from multiple transmitters can result in patterns of constructive and destructive interference, particularly in strong LOS environments, leading to weak signal spots where users experience poor channel conditions due to persistent destructive interference, especially for stationary users.

Innovation Solution

Modulating each block of broadcast transmission with a random time-varying phase rotation pattern, independent between sectors, and employing outer codes like Reed-Solomon codes, along with inner error correction techniques, to create time-varying self-interference diversity, preventing persistent destructive interference and improving signal quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If multiple transmitters broadcast the same signal simultaneously, then coverage area and system capacity are increased, but patterns of constructive and destructive interference are created leading to weak signal spots

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidsignal quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the phase rotation pattern time-varying rather than static. Each transmitter applies a different time-varying phase rotation pattern to the broadcast signal, which causes the interference patterns to change over time. This temporal variation prevents stationary users from experiencing persistent destructive interference, thereby improving signal quality while maintaining expanded coverage area from multiple transmitters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the phase parameter of the broadcast signal by applying different phase rotation patterns at each transmitter. By varying the phase parameter dynamically over time and differently across transmitters, the interference characteristics are modified to prevent persistent weak signal spots, thus resolving the contradiction between coverage expansion and signal quality maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If multiple transmitters are used to increase capacity, then more users can be served, but stationary users experience persistent destructive interference in certain areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capacityVSAvoidchannel condition
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic phase rotation patterns that vary with time at each transmitter. This temporal dynamics ensures that the relative phase relationships between signals from multiple transmitters change continuously, preventing stationary users from being trapped in persistent destructive interference zones. This maintains reliable channel conditions while allowing the system to serve more users through multiple transmitters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic phase rotation patterns where each transmitter applies phase rotations that vary periodically over time. This periodic action ensures that the interference pattern cycles through different configurations, preventing any single destructive interference pattern from persisting for extended periods, thereby improving channel conditions for stationary users while maintaining high system capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Area of stationary object

If the same signal is broadcast from multiple sectors, then broadcast coverage is extended, but self-interference patterns are created that degrade signal quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebroadcast coverageVSAvoidself-interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static self-interference problem into a dynamic one by applying time-varying phase rotation patterns. This makes the self-interference patterns change over time rather than remaining fixed, preventing the formation of persistent harmful interference zones that would degrade signal quality in specific geographic locations while maintaining extended broadcast coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the phase parameter of the broadcast signal dynamically at each transmitter to alter the self-interference characteristics. By varying this parameter over time and differently across transmitters, the harmful self-interference patterns are transformed into time-varying patterns that do not persist in any single location, thus extending coverage without proportionally increasing harmful interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach increases coverage and quality of broadcast signals, reducing packet errors and ensuring more users receive high-quality broadcasts by making self-interference time-varying, thus improving overall system performance and user throughput.

Implementation Method 1

modulating each block of broadcast transmission with a random time-varying phase rotation pattern

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase modulation: Phase Modulation

Implementation Method 2

patterns of constructive and destructive interference

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic wave interference: Interference

Data Source

PatentUS7515643B2Modulation for broadcasting from multiple transmitters
Publication Date: 2009.04.07 ERICSSON EVDO INC
  • US7515643B2 patent drawing
  • US7515643B2 patent drawing
  • US7515643B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a cellular network, randomness is introduced into a transmitted signal at each transmitter, and the resulting received signal, which is the sum of all received signals, fluctuates more in time than a signal transmitted without the introduced randomness. While the introduction of randomness can diminish reception of some parts of the signal at the receiver, the transmitted signal can be encoded using forward error correction coding techniques, which allows the receiver to recover all of the signal information despite some diminished reception. Such randomization provides time diversity so that receivers can have more consistent performance. For broadcasted data, where users with the worst channel condition dictates the overall performance, having consistent performance across users can improve the overall network performance.