Brushed DC Motor Speed-Torque Control for Load Torque Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing brushed DC motor control systems fail to effectively account for high load and friction torques, particularly in applications like vehicle power steering systems, leading to undesirable vibrations and noise.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that incorporates load and friction torques into the speed-to-torque controller, using modified proportional, derivative, and position-dependent torque components, along with feedforward gains, to enhance control precision and stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional speed control is used for brushed DC motors in power steering systems, then the control structure remains simple, but vibrations and noise occur due to high load and friction torques

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibrations and noiseVSAvoidcontroller structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller proactively compensates for load torque and friction torque before they cause vibrations and noise. By calculating and applying compensation signals based on motor position and speed, the system prevents harmful effects rather than reacting to them, thereby reducing vibrations and noise while maintaining a relatively simple control structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The controller uses feedback from motor position and speed sensors to continuously adjust the compensation signals for load torque and friction torque. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt to changing operating conditions and effectively suppress vibrations and noise without requiring overly complex control architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If load and friction torques are not accounted for in the controller, then the control system remains simple, but speed control precision deteriorates under varying load conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed control precisionVSAvoidcontroller structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller pre-calculates compensation signals for load torque and friction torque based on motor position and speed, applying these corrections before they affect speed control precision. This proactive approach maintains accurate speed control under varying load conditions without requiring a fundamentally complex control structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The controller dynamically adjusts compensation parameters based on motor position and speed, adapting to different operating conditions. By changing these parameters in real-time, the system maintains high speed control precision across varying loads while keeping the overall control structure manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If modified torque components with feedforward gains are implemented, then control stability improves under position-dependent loads, but the control algorithm becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol stabilityVSAvoidcontrol algorithm
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller pre-calculates compensation signals for position-dependent load torque and friction torque using feedforward gains, applying these corrections before disturbances affect control stability. This approach enhances stability under varying positional loads while maintaining a relatively straightforward control algorithm structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The controller uses position and speed-dependent parameters with feedforward gains to adapt to changing load conditions. By dynamically adjusting these parameters based on motor state, the system achieves improved control stability under position-dependent loads without requiring an overly complex control algorithm

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250286484A1System and method for speed-torque control of brushed DC motors
Publication Date: 2025.09.11 STEERING SOLUTIONS IP HOLDING CORP
  • US20250286484A1 patent drawing
  • US20250286484A1 patent drawing
  • US20250286484A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Technical solutions are described for controlling a brushed direct current (DC) motor, including: determining a speed difference signal based on a difference between a speed command signal and a motor speed of the brushed DC motor; determining a torque command signal based on the speed difference signal; determining a voltage command based on the torque command signal; and applying a DC voltage to the brushed DC motor based on the voltage command. Determining the torque command signal based on the speed difference signal further includes at least one of: determining a modified proportional torque component including a feedforward gain term times the speed command signal, with the torque command signal including the modified proportional torque component; and/or determining a modified derivative torque component including a time derivative of the motor speed of the brushed DC motor, with the torque command signal including the modified derivative torque component.