Brushless Motor Axial Rotor Support for Friction Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Brushless motors for electric power steering systems face challenges in reducing friction losses and cogging torque while maintaining high efficiency and stable rotation, as pre-load bearing structures increase friction but are necessary to prevent rotor movement, and size reduction is required.

Innovation Solution

A brushless motor design with a rotor supported by deep-groove ball bearings without pre-load, allowing axial movement up to 2 mm to minimize friction and cogging torque, and an equal axial length to the stator to prevent excessive cogging, ensuring efficient and stable operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a pre-load bearing structure is adopted to prevent rotor movement, then rotor stability is improved, but friction losses increase and motor efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor stabilityVSAvoidfriction losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions from a static pre-loaded bearing structure to a dynamic structure where the rotor can move axially within a controlled range (0.5-2mm). This dynamic capability allows the rotor to self-adjust its position to minimize cogging torque while maintaining operational stability, thereby reducing friction losses without sacrificing rotor stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the axial length of the stator is made sufficiently larger than the rotor to eliminate leakage magnetic flux, then cogging torque is reduced, but motor size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecogging torqueVSAvoidmotor size
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the operational parameter of rotor position by allowing axial movement within 0.5-2mm range. This parameter change enables the rotor to find optimal positions that minimize the effect of leakage magnetic flux and cogging torque, achieving reduced harmful factors without increasing motor size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

By making the rotor axially movable rather than fixed, the system dynamically adjusts to minimize cogging torque effects. This dynamic approach allows the rotor to self-position to reduce the impact of leakage flux at the stator ends, achieving smooth rotation without increasing the axial length of the stator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of energy

If the rotor is made movable in the axial direction to reduce friction losses, then motor efficiency is improved, but rotor stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefriction lossesVSAvoidrotor stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The invention implements a dynamic balance by allowing controlled axial movement (0.5-2mm) that enables the rotor to self-adjust to positions minimizing both friction losses and cogging torque. This controlled dynamics maintains stability while improving efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The continuous axial movement capability within the specified range allows the rotor to continuously optimize its position during operation, maintaining low friction losses and stability throughout the operational cycle rather than being fixed in a suboptimal position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces friction losses and cogging torque, achieving high motor efficiency and stable rotation without increasing size, suitable for compact applications like electric power steering systems.

Implementation Method 1

friction losses in the bearing which supports the rotor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

rotor is supported by deep-groove ball bearings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBall bearing: Ball Bearing

Implementation Method 3

A rotating magnetic field is produced inside the housing by controlling the supply of power to these stator coils, and the torque is applied to the magnet in the rotating magnetic field to rotate the rotor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 4

magnet having a plurality of magnetic poles on the outer circumferential surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 5

the torque is applied to the magnet in the rotating magnetic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorque: Torque

Implementation Method 6

Even at both ends in the axial direction, leakage magnetic flux may change due to a positional displacement between the stator and the rotor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLeakage magnetic flux: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 7

cogging torque can be reduced by making the axial length of the stator sufficiently larger than the axial length of the rotor and eliminating the influence of leakage magnetic flux

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCogging torque: Torque

Data Source

PatentUS7839039B2Brushless motor
Publication Date: 2010.11.23 JTEKT CORP
  • US7839039B2 patent drawing
  • US7839039B2 patent drawing
  • US7839039B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rotary shaft of a rotor including a magnet with a plurality of magnetic poles arranged at equal intervals on an outer circumference is supported at both ends by bearings. By externally fitting the inner ring of one bearing to the rotary shaft and holding it to be immovable in an axial direction and loosely fitting the outer ring of the bearing into the support hole and positioning it with belleville springs which are in contact resiliently with both sides, the rotary shaft and the rotor are supported so that they are movable in an axial direction within a movement amount of not greater than 2 mm according to a movement of the bearing caused against spring forces of the belleville springs.