Brushless Motor Commutation Timing for Speed-Dependent Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Brushless permanent-magnet motors face inefficiencies due to mismatched waveforms of phase current and back EMF, particularly at varying speed ranges, which affects torque-to-current ratio and power delivery.

Innovation Solution

A method of controlling the motor by advancing commutation at lower speed ranges and retarding it at higher speed ranges, with adaptive commutation periods based on supply voltage and motor speed, to synchronize the phase current with back EMF, ensuring efficient power delivery across a wide range of speeds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If commutation is advanced at all speed ranges, then motor acceleration is improved, but phase current waveform mismatches back EMF waveform at high speeds, reducing efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor accelerationVSAvoidmotor efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the commutation timing adjustable based on operating conditions. The controller dynamically switches between advanced commutation (for acceleration) and retarded commutation (for efficiency) based on the motor speed range, transforming a static commutation system into a dynamic one that adapts to different operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the commutation timing parameter based on motor speed. At low speeds (below 50 krpm), commutation is advanced relative to back EMF zero-crossings to improve acceleration. At high speeds (above 50 krpm), commutation is retarded to align current waveform with back EMF waveform, maximizing efficiency. This parameter change resolves the contradiction between acceleration and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If commutation is retarded at high speed ranges, then phase current matches back EMF waveform better, but insufficient current is driven into winding for acceleration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor efficiencyVSAvoidpower delivery
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the speed range into two distinct zones: low speed range (below 50 krpm) where advanced commutation is used for power delivery, and high speed range (above 50 krpm) where retarded commutation is used for efficiency. This segmentation allows each zone to operate under optimal commutation timing, resolving the contradiction between power delivery and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The commutation timing parameter is changed based on the motor speed range. The controller monitors motor speed and adjusts commutation timing accordingly: advanced timing for low speeds to ensure sufficient power delivery, and retarded timing for high speeds to optimize efficiency by matching current waveform with back EMF waveform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If commutation timing is fixed, then control simplicity is maintained, but motor performance is compromised across varying speed ranges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidmotor performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic commutation timing control where the controller automatically adjusts commutation timing based on motor speed feedback. While the control logic is more complex than fixed timing, the system maintains ease of operation through automated speed-based switching between advanced and retarded commutation modes, achieving both adaptability and operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback control by monitoring motor speed and using this information to adjust commutation timing. The controller receives speed feedback and automatically selects the appropriate commutation strategy (advanced or retarded) based on the current speed range, maintaining optimal performance across varying operating conditions without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances motor efficiency by matching the phase current waveform with back EMF, allowing for improved acceleration and power management without compromising motor performance at different speed ranges.

Implementation Method 1

commutating a winding of the motor at times relative to zero-crossings of back EMF in the winding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBack EMF: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9438150B2Method of controlling a brushless permanent-magnet motor
Publication Date: 2016.09.06 DYSON TECH LTD
  • US9438150B2 patent drawing
  • US9438150B2 patent drawing
  • US9438150B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of controlling a brushless permanent-magnet motor. The method includes commutating a winding of the motor at times relative to zero-crossings of back EMF in the winding. Commutation is then advanced when the motor operates over a first speed range, and commutation is retarded when the motor operates over a second speed range higher than that of the first speed range.