Brushless Power Tool Motor Control Against Voltage-Limit Wind-Up

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Brushless DC motors in hand-held power tools experience wind-up effects and undesirable delayed behavior due to voltage limits, where the control unit cannot impress current into the motor windings, leading to uncorrectable residual faults and suboptimal performance.

Innovation Solution

The control unit adjusts the current request signal based on the voltage difference between the system voltage and the target voltage value, using a difference block, PI controller, and limiting block to avoid wind-up effects, allowing for variable and transformed voltage considerations, thereby optimizing motor control without requiring complex motor parameter measurements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If field-oriented control is used with integral component for speed control, then control precision is improved, but wind-up effects occur at voltage limit causing delayed motor response

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed control precisionVSAvoidmotor response delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit calculates the voltage difference between system voltage and target voltage value before generating the current request signal. This preliminary action prevents the integral component from accumulating erroneous values when voltage limit is reached, thereby avoiding wind-up effects and eliminating delayed motor response while maintaining precision control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Power

If maximum system voltage is used to meet high speed demand, then power output is improved, but voltage limit causes integral component to accumulate uncorrectable residual faults

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor power outputVSAvoidcontrol system reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit continuously monitors the voltage difference between system voltage and target voltage value, and uses this feedback to adjust the current request signal. When voltage limit is reached, the feedback mechanism prevents the integral component from accumulating residual faults, ensuring reliable control operation at maximum power output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If conventional field-oriented control is used without voltage difference consideration, then device complexity is reduced, but wind-up effects cause suboptimal motor performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol unit complexityVSAvoidmotor performance efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit modifies the current request signal parameter by calculating and applying the voltage difference between system voltage and target voltage value. This parameter change approach is simple to implement yet effectively prevents wind-up effects, optimizing motor performance without significantly increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240253202A1Electric hand-held power tool
Publication Date: 2024.08.01 HILTI AG
  • US20240253202A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An electric hand-held power tool, having a brushless DC motor and a control unit for field-oriented control of the DC motor on the basis of a current request signal and a target voltage value derived from the current request signal, wherein the hand-held power tool is further designed to provide a system voltage to supply the DC motor, wherein the control unit is set up to adjust the current request signal taking into account a voltage difference between the system voltage and the target voltage value.