Bubble Column Reactor Counter-Current Flow Hydrocracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hydrocracking processes in petroleum refineries face challenges such as low hydrogen purity at the reactor outlet and solids accumulation in co-current upflow designs, which require additional resources and vigilance for removal.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a counter-current flow system in bubble column reactors, where a petroleum fraction with a high boiling point is reacted with a hydrogen-rich gas, preventing solids accumulation and maintaining high hydrogen purity throughout the process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If a co-current upflow bubble column reactor is used, then the reactor can process heavy crude oil residual fraction, but the hydrogen purity at the outlet is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogen purityVSAvoidconversion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional co-current flow arrangement by implementing a counter-current flow system where the liquid petroleum fraction flows downward while the hydrogen-rich gas flows upward. This inversion allows the hydrogen-poor liquid outlet to be positioned at the bottom and the hydrogen-rich gas outlet at the top, thereby achieving high hydrogen purity at the gas outlet while maintaining effective mass transfer and conversion efficiency throughout the reactor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Productivity

If a co-current upflow design is used, then the reactor can process the feed, but solids accumulate at the bottom requiring additional removal resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capabilityVSAvoidsolid removal system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The counter-current flow arrangement inverts the conventional co-current design, causing the liquid stream to flow downward while the gas stream flows upward. This inversion creates a continuous outlet at the bottom for the liquid product, preventing solids accumulation through continuous removal rather than requiring intermittent cleaning operations and additional solid removal equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The counter-current flow system establishes continuous outlet streams for both liquid and gas products, eliminating the need for intermittent solid removal operations. The continuous flow prevents solids from accumulating at the bottom, maintaining steady-state operation and reducing the need for additional solid removal resources and vigilance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Quantity of substance

If additional equipment like hot separators is added, then hydrogen purity can be improved, but device complexity and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogen purityVSAvoidequipment requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The counter-current flow bubble column reactor achieves high hydrogen purity through its inherent flow arrangement and mass transfer characteristics, eliminating the need for external hot separator equipment. The reactor itself performs the separation function by positioning the hydrogen-poor liquid outlet at the bottom and the hydrogen-rich gas outlet at the top, thereby achieving self-service hydrogen purification without additional equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The counter-current flow design enhances hydrogen purity, prevents solids accumulation, and eliminates the need for additional equipment like hot separators, improving operational efficiency and reducing resource requirements.

Implementation Method 1

the petroleum fraction can be in counter-current flow with respect to the gas rich in hydrogen inside the bubble column reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCounter-current flow: Convection

Implementation Method 2

a hydrocracking process can split feed molecules into smaller molecules having a higher average volatility and a greater economic value. At the same time, a hydrocracking process can improve material quality by increasing the hydrogen to carbon ratio of the stream and by removing sulfur and nitrogen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrocracking: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

the reactor can provide a gas-suspension separation at the top of the reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas-liquid separation: Density Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS8999247B2Process for reacting a petroleum fraction
Publication Date: 2015.04.07 UOP LLC
  • US8999247B2 patent drawing
  • US8999247B2 patent drawing
  • US8999247B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one exemplary embodiment, a system for reacting a first feed can include a petroleum fraction having at least about 90%, by volume, with a boiling point of at least about 300° C. The system can include a bubble column reactor. The bubble column reactor, in turn, can include a first inlet for the first feed and a second inlet for a second feed including a gas rich in hydrogen. In addition, the petroleum fraction may be in counter-current flow with respect to the gas rich in hydrogen inside the bubble column reactor.