Bubble Column Reactor Stripping for DMC Synthesis Yield

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for synthesizing dimethyl carbonate (DMC) from methanol and urea face challenges such as low production rates, high costs, and thermodynamic limitations, particularly due to the difficulty in activating CO2 and the instability of DMC under reaction conditions, which affects yield and selectivity.

Innovation Solution

The process employs a horizontal sectionalized bubble column reactor with cross-flow stripping using inert gases or superheated vapors to efficiently remove ammonia and DMC, preventing decomposition and enhancing yield and selectivity, while using catalysts like hydrotalcite or ionic liquids to facilitate the reaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional synthesis methods are used, then the reaction can proceed, but the production rate is low and the process is economically unviable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction rateVSAvoideconomic viability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes multiple process parameters including temperature (100-200°C), pressure (1-10 atm), and the introduction of stripping agents to shift the equilibrium and increase production rate. These parameter changes enable the reaction to proceed at higher rates while maintaining economic viability through improved yield and reduced costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces stripping agents (inert gases or superheated vapors) as intermediaries to remove ammonia and DMC from the reaction mixture. This intermediary mechanism prevents reverse reaction and decomposition, thereby increasing production rate and economic feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If DMC is formed under reaction conditions, then the synthesis proceeds, but DMC decomposes and yield is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveyieldVSAvoidDMC stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses stripping agents as intermediaries to continuously remove DMC from the reaction zone. This prevents DMC decomposition by maintaining low concentrations in the reaction mixture, thereby improving yield while preserving product stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts DMC and ammonia from the reaction mixture through stripping with inert gases or superheated vapors. This extraction mechanism prevents decomposition reactions and maintains high yield by removing products as they are formed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If CO2 is used as raw material, then the process becomes environmentally acceptable, but activation of CO2 is difficult and thermodynamic limitations exist

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental acceptabilityVSAvoidactivation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces catalysts (hydrotalcite, ionic liquids) as intermediaries to facilitate CO2 activation. These catalysts lower the activation energy and make the thermodynamically limited reaction feasible under mild conditions, maintaining environmental acceptability while improving manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes reaction parameters including temperature (100-200°C) and pressure (1-10 atm) to overcome thermodynamic limitations. These parameter changes, combined with catalysts, enable CO2 activation to proceed efficiently while maintaining the environmentally acceptable nature of using CO2 as raw material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If ammonia is removed from reaction mixture, then the equilibrium shifts forward, but additional separation steps are required

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveconversionVSAvoidseparation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the reaction and stripping functions into a single integrated reactor system. The stripping agents are introduced directly into the reaction zone, and both reaction and separation occur simultaneously, thereby increasing conversion without adding complex separation equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses stripping agents (inert gases or superheated vapors) as intermediaries to facilitate simultaneous reaction and separation. These intermediaries carry away ammonia and DMC from the reaction zone, achieving high conversion while avoiding complex separation processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly increases the conversion and selectivity of methyl carbamate (MC) and DMC, reducing decomposition and side product formation, thereby improving the overall efficiency and economic viability of the synthesis process.

Implementation Method 1

passing the inert gas or superheated vapours into said reactor vessel through inlet valve by regulating the pressure to ensure positive flow of the inert gas and stripping ammonia and DMC formed during the reaction through the outlet port

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStripping:

Implementation Method 2

The reaction may be carried out in presence or absence of catalyst and the synthesis of dimethyl carbonate can be carried out using methanol and urea or methyl carbamate and methanol in presence of catalyst selected from hydrotalcite, double metal cyanide, cenosphere or ionic liquid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

by regulating the pressure to ensure positive flow of the inert gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 4

passing the product gases collected from the outlet port through condenser and gas-liquid separator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Data Source

PatentUS10597357B2Synthesis of methyl carbamate and dimethyl carbonate (DMC) in presence of stripping with inert gas or superheated vapours and a reactor for the same
Publication Date: 2020.03.24 COUNCIL OF SCI & IND RES
  • US10597357B2 patent drawing
  • US10597357B2 patent drawing
  • US10597357B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to synthesis of methyl carbamate (MC) and dimethyl carbonate (DMC) in presence of stripping inert gas or superheated methanol vapors using packed column reactor and bubble column reactor.