Buck-Boost Converter Duty Cycle Offset Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing buck-boost converters face challenges in determining the optimal operating mode (buck, boost, or buck-boost) to provide the requested output voltage and current while minimizing power losses and ensuring smooth transitions between modes, as current solutions do not adequately account for load current and voltage drop across switches.

Innovation Solution

A voltage-mode buck-boost converter with a voltage feedback loop, comprising a buck converter and a boost converter, each controlled by synchronized duty cycle signals, dynamically adjusts the offset voltage to optimize duty cycles and operate in buck-boost mode with all switches switching once per clock cycle, ensuring efficient power management and smooth transitions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If simple voltage threshold comparison is used for mode selection, then the control implementation is simple, but the mode selection does not account for load current and voltage drop, leading to non-optimal operation and large output voltage glitches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol implementation complexityVSAvoidoutput voltage stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the controller monitors the actual operating conditions (input voltage, output voltage, load current) and dynamically adjusts the duty cycles of both buck and boost converters. The error voltage from the feedback loop is used to modulate the duty cycles, ensuring optimal performance and smooth transitions between modes while maintaining stable output voltage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from static voltage threshold comparison to dynamic duty cycle adjustment. The duty cycles of the buck and boost converters are dynamically modified based on the error voltage and operating conditions, allowing the system to adapt to changing load currents and voltage drops, thereby achieving smooth mode transitions and eliminating output voltage glitches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If separate buck-mode and boost-mode voltage thresholds are set to account for maximum output current, then load current considerations are included, but the buck-boost mode operation area becomes wide, creating large output voltage glitches during mode changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload current adaptationVSAvoidoutput voltage stability during mode transition
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent ensures continuous regulation by maintaining overlapping operation of both buck and boost converters during mode transitions. The duty cycles are continuously adjusted based on the error voltage, preventing gaps or discontinuities in voltage regulation. This continuous control action eliminates output voltage glitches that would otherwise occur during mode changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The error voltage from the feedback loop serves as an intermediary signal that coordinates the operation of both buck and boost converters. By using this intermediary error signal to modulate both duty cycles simultaneously, the system achieves smooth transitions without direct switching between discrete modes, thereby eliminating voltage glitches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If fixed duty cycles are used for buck and boost converters, then the control implementation is simple, but the converter cannot optimize power efficiency across different input voltage and load current conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol implementation complexityVSAvoidpower losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically changes the duty cycle parameters of both buck and boost converters based on operating conditions. The error voltage from the feedback loop is used to modulate the duty cycles, allowing the system to optimize power efficiency across different input voltages and load currents. This parameter adjustment minimizes conduction and switching losses under varying conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback loop continuously monitors the output voltage and generates an error voltage that reflects the deviation from the target voltage. This error signal is used to adjust the duty cycles in real-time, optimizing the power transfer efficiency and minimizing losses under different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10355596B2Buck-boost converter
Publication Date: 2019.07.16 DIALOG SEMICONDUCTOR (UK) LTD
  • US10355596B2 patent drawing
  • US10355596B2 patent drawing
  • US10355596B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A buck-boost converter and a method are presented. The buck-boost converter comprises an inductor, a buck converter, and a boost converter. The buck converter controls switches according to a buck duty cycle, whereas the boost converter controls switches according to a boost duty cycle. The converter contains a voltage feedback loop for regulating an output voltage of the converter. A buck comparator generates the buck duty cycle signal by comparing the error voltage with a ramp voltage. A boost comparator generates the boost duty cycle signal by comparing a boost error voltage with the ramp voltage, wherein the boost error voltage is indicative of a sum of the error voltage and an offset voltage and the boost ramp voltage is indicative of a sum of the ramp voltage and the offset voltage. There is a duty cycle feedback loop for adjusting the buck and boost duty cycles.