Scalable Buck-Boost DC-DC Converter Transistor Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing DC-DC converters face challenges in efficiently transitioning between buck and boost modes due to varying load conditions and supply voltages, leading to inefficiencies and increased output ripple, particularly at light-load conditions where AC losses dominate.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a DC-DC converter with multiple transistor fingers and an activation controller that dynamically adjusts the number of active transistors based on load current, reducing AC losses during light-load conditions without degrading performance at high current draws, and optimizing the number of active transistors to match the load demand.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If the number of active transistors is increased to handle high current draws, then the converter can meet high load demands, but AC losses increase during light-load conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload handling capabilityVSAvoidAC losses
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The transistor bank is divided into multiple individual transistor fingers (e.g., 4 transistors per finger, 2 fingers = 8 transistors total) that can be independently controlled. The activation controller selectively activates only the number of transistors needed based on load current magnitude, preventing unnecessary AC losses during light-load conditions while maintaining full power capability when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the number of active transistors based on real-time load current conditions. The activation controller monitors load current and selectively activates or deactivates transistor fingers, transitioning the system from a static all-or-nothing transistor activation approach to a dynamic, load-adaptive configuration that optimizes efficiency across varying operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If all transistors are kept active to ensure sufficient current handling capability, then the converter can meet peak load demands, but power efficiency deteriorates during light-load conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent handling sufficiencyVSAvoidpower efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The transistor bank is segmented into multiple independently controllable transistor fingers. This segmentation allows the activation controller to activate only the necessary number of transistors to meet the current load demand, ensuring sufficient current handling capability while avoiding the activation of excess transistors that would waste energy during light-load conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameter of transistor activation count based on load conditions. By adjusting the number of active transistors from 0 to all available transistors depending on load current magnitude, the system adapts its power consumption characteristics to match actual operational needs, maintaining reliability while optimizing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the converter operates in buck-boost mode to handle varying input and output voltage requirements, then voltage flexibility is improved, but transition control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage conversion flexibilityVSAvoidtransition control algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The transistor bank is divided into multiple independently controlled transistor fingers with separate activation control. This segmentation simplifies the transition control between buck and boost modes by allowing granular control of power delivery during mode transitions, enabling smoother and more precise control compared to controlling all transistors uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The activation controller dynamically adjusts which transistor fingers are active based on operating conditions and mode transitions. This dynamic control enables flexible voltage conversion while simplifying the overall control algorithm by allowing selective engagement of transistor subsets during transitions, reducing the computational burden compared to controlling all transistors simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8872487B2Scalable buck-boost DC-DC converter
Publication Date: 2014.10.28 MACOM TECH SOLUTIONS HLDG INC
  • US8872487B2 patent drawing
  • US8872487B2 patent drawing
  • US8872487B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A DC-DC converter is disclosed having an input configured to receive an input signal and an output configured to present an output signal at a different voltage than the input signal. The converter also includes at least one inductor and at least one capacitor. Two or more transistors fingers are provided such that at least one of the two or more transistor fingers comprises two or more switching transistors, each of which has an input, an output, a control input. An activation controller connect to at least one of the two or more switching transistors, the activation controller configured to control whether the at least one of the two or more switching transistors is active or non-active. Also disclosed is a buck-boost converter with numerous controlled switches that establish the converter in either buck-boost mode, buck mode or boost mode.