Buck Converter Deadtime Control for Light Load Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional deadtime control schemes for buck converters optimize for heavy load efficiency, resulting in low efficiency at light loads due to hard switching and increased power consumption, as they maintain a fixed small rising edge dead time, which leads to higher switching losses and reduced battery life.

Innovation Solution

A new deadtime control scheme that uses a zero-cross detector to elongate the rising edge dead time when the inductor valley current drops below zero, enabling zero voltage switching (ZVS) and reducing switching losses, while maintaining heavy load efficiency by adjusting the dead time via a data selector.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the rising edge dead time is elongated to achieve ZVS and reduce switching loss, then light load efficiency is improved, but heavy load efficiency may deteriorate due to increased dead time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching lossVSAvoidheavy load efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the dead time based on real-time detection of inductor valley current. The elongation of dead time is applied only when light load conditions are detected, while heavy load operation uses the original optimized dead time. This dynamic approach ensures that ZVS is achieved when beneficial (light load) without compromising heavy load performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by making the dead time modification condition-specific. Different dead time values are used for different operating conditions: elongated dead time for light load (where ZVS provides benefit) and standard dead time for heavy load (where the original optimization applies). This localized approach prevents the contradiction from arising in the first place.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of energy

If a zero-cross detector is added to dynamically adjust dead time, then light load efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight load efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The zero-cross detector acts as an intermediary element that senses the inductor valley current and triggers the dead time modification. This intermediary component enables the dynamic adjustment mechanism with minimal added complexity, as it only needs to detect the zero-crossing event and activate the dead time elongation accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The control function is segmented into distinct components: the zero-cross detector, the dead time modification logic, and the existing PWM controller. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function independently, making the overall system easier to implement and maintain despite the added functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11716024B2Deadtime control scheme for improving buck converter light load efficiency
Publication Date: 2023.08.01 REED SEMICON CORP
  • US11716024B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A deadtime control scheme for improving buck converter light load efficiency.