Four-Switch Buck-Boost Converter COT PCM Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional four-switch BUCKBOOST converters have low efficiency and high costs due to fixed frequency control methods, requiring high current rating devices and complex control circuits, which are not adaptable to varying input and output voltages.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a combination of Constant Off-time (COT) control and Peak Current Mode (PCM) control to automatically transition between BUCK, BUCKBOOST, and BOOST modes, eliminating the need for a fixed clock signal and simplifying the control circuit, thereby reducing power consumption and complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If traditional fixed frequency control method is used, then the converter can operate with simple control logic, but the efficiency is low and power consumption is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconverter efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic switching frequency adjustment by combining COT control for automatic mode transition with PCM control for turn-off timing determination. The switching frequency varies dynamically based on input voltage and load conditions, optimizing efficiency across different operating points while maintaining manageable control complexity through modular control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the control parameter from fixed frequency to variable frequency determined by peak current mode control. The turn-off timing of switches is determined by peak current information rather than fixed clock signal, allowing the system to adapt switching parameters to operating conditions and improve overall efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If traditional fixed frequency control method is used, then the control circuit can be simpler, but the power consumption is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidcontrol circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic switching frequency adjustment by combining COT control for automatic mode transition with PCM control for turn-off timing determination. The switching frequency varies dynamically based on input voltage and load conditions, optimizing efficiency across different operating points while maintaining manageable control complexity through modular control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional BUCK or BOOST converter is used, then the design is simpler, but the adaptability to varying input and output voltages is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage range adaptabilityVSAvoidconverter structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a four-switch BUCKBOOST converter that can operate in BUCK mode, BOOST mode, or BUCKBOOST mode depending on the input voltage relative to output voltage. The COT control automatically transitions between modes, providing universal voltage conversion capability across wide input and output voltage ranges while maintaining a unified converter structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If fixed clock signal is used for switch timing, then the control is easier to implement, but the converter cannot adapt to varying operating conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating condition adaptabilityVSAvoidcontrol signal complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the control parameter from fixed frequency to variable frequency determined by peak current mode control. The turn-off timing of switches is determined by peak current information rather than fixed clock signal, allowing the system to adapt switching parameters to operating conditions and improve overall efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10250142B1Advanced constant off-time control for four-switch buckboost converter
Publication Date: 2019.04.02 M3 TECHNOLOGY
  • US10250142B1 patent drawing
  • US10250142B1 patent drawing
  • US10250142B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a system and method for managing a four-switch BUCKBOOST converter with a combination of a Constant Off-time (COT) control and a Peak Current Mode (PCM) control. With the COT control, the four-switch BUCKBOOST converter can automatically and smoothly transition between a BUCK mode, a BUCKBOOST mode, and a BOOST mode when input voltage varies. In some implementations, the four-switch BUCKBOOST converter only requires a simple, low-power-consumption and robust system control loop compensation with the PCM control for inductor current, and, thus, eliminates the need for oscillator and slope compensation circuit. The PCM control is used to determine turn-off-timing of switches of the four-switch BUCKBOOST converter. The system control loop compensation can provide cycle-by-cycle current limit function to protect the converter and load from over-current damages.