Excavator Bucket Bottom Plate Inclination Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing buckets for excavating machines are inefficient in loading large amounts of soil due to suboptimal design, leading to reduced excavation capacity.

Innovation Solution

A bucket design featuring a bottom plate with inclined portions, a bracket for pivotability, and a front lip, optimized to maximize soil loading capacity by adjusting angles and recessed portions for improved soil movement and penetration resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the bucket uses a conventional bottom plate design, then the structure is simple, but the soil loading capacity is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoil loading capacityVSAvoidbottom plate structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The bottom plate is segmented into multiple functional zones: a first inclined portion for initial soil entry, a second inclined portion for soil redirection, and a deepest portion for maximum soil accumulation. This segmentation allows each zone to perform a specific function in the soil loading process, thereby increasing overall loading capacity while maintaining a relatively simple monolithic structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the bottom plate are designed with different inclination angles and depths to optimize soil flow and accumulation in specific areas. The first inclined portion has a shallower angle for easy soil entry, while the second inclined portion has a steeper angle for efficient soil redirection toward the deepest portion, creating local optimizations that collectively enhance loading capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Quantity of substance

If the bucket has a larger opening to load more soil, then the loading capacity increases, but the penetration resistance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoil loading capacityVSAvoidpenetration resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The bottom plate incorporates curved inclined surfaces instead of flat planes, creating a smooth, continuous flow path for soil. The curved geometry of the first and second inclined portions guides soil particles along optimized trajectories into the deepest portion, reducing turbulence and improving loading efficiency without requiring a larger opening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Data Source

PatentUS12049740B2Bucket and work vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.07.30 KOMATSU LTD
  • US12049740B2 patent drawing
  • US12049740B2 patent drawing
  • US12049740B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The bucket includes a bottom plate including a first deepest portion, a bracket provided on a back surface of the bottom plate, and a front lip. The bottom plate includes a first inclined portion on a side where the bracket is attached. A first reference straight line is defined that passes through a pivot axis of a bucket and a tip end of the front lip. A second reference straight line is defined that is orthogonal to the first reference straight line and passes through the first deepest portion. An angle formed between the second reference straight line and the front lip is smaller than an angle formed between the second reference straight line and the first inclined portion. An intersection point between the first reference straight line and the second reference straight line is located close to the front lip on the first reference straight line.