Dynamic Budget Pacing Using Spending Feedback Loops

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems lack the ability to dynamically adjust content distribution budgets in real-time based on spending feedback, leading to inefficiencies and inconsistencies in content delivery.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic budget control system that adjusts spending budgets using feedback loops and machine learning models to optimize content distribution across multiple client devices, allowing for real-time adjustments based on spending rates and traffic patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a static budget is used for content distribution, then budget management is simple, but spending efficiency and adaptability to traffic patterns deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebudget management complexityVSAvoidcontent distribution efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic budget adjustment by continuously monitoring spending rates and traffic patterns, then automatically modifying budget allocations in real-time. The system transitions from a static budget to a dynamic one that adapts to changing conditions, resolving the contradiction between management simplicity and distribution efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a feedback loop that collects data on actual spending rates and traffic patterns, processes this information through machine learning models, and uses the results to adjust budget allocations. This continuous feedback mechanism enables the system to maintain both manageable complexity and high efficiency by making data-driven budget decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If real-time budget adjustments are implemented, then content distribution efficiency improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent distribution efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces machine learning models as intermediary components that automatically process spending data and traffic patterns to determine optimal budget allocations. These models act as mediators between raw data and budget decisions, reducing the need for complex manual intervention while maintaining high distribution efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service capabilities where the budget control mechanism automatically adjusts allocations based on real-time data without requiring external intervention. The machine learning models autonomously analyze patterns and make optimization decisions, reducing system complexity by eliminating the need for complex human-in-the-loop processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If dynamic budget control is used, then resource allocation improves, but measurement and detection difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidspending rate measurement difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual measurement and detection processes with automated machine learning models that continuously monitor and analyze spending rates and traffic patterns. This substitution of mechanical/manual processes with automated computational systems improves resource allocation while managing the complexity of measurement through standardized algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12469048B2System and method for dynamic budget control
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 YAHOO AD TECH LLC
  • US12469048B2 patent drawing
  • US12469048B2 patent drawing
  • US12469048B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more computing devices, systems, and/or methods are provided. In an example, a first budget is determined for a first instance of a first time period. A pacing system, that is configured to pace spending over a time period based upon a budget, is controlled to spend on transmission of content to a first plurality of client devices using the first budget during the first instance of the first time period. Feedback indicating a rate of spending associated with the transmission of content to the first plurality of client devices is received. Using the feedback, the first budget is updated to determine a second budget for a second instance of the first time period. The pacing system is controlled to spend on transmission of content to a second plurality of client devices using the second budget during the second instance of the first time period.