Buffer Carousel for Dynamic Goods Sorting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing conveyor systems for picking piece goods face challenges such as high costs, complex logistics, increased risk of errors, and system disruptions due to capacity overload, machine failures, and lack of effective buffering and sorting capabilities, particularly in dynamic 'goods-to-person' systems.

Innovation Solution

A device and method that incorporates a removal device with a removal handling module and a conveyor unit, featuring a buffer unit and adjustable feed units to optimize the transfer and buffering of goods, ensuring continuous operation and minimizing delays by integrating a buffer carousel or dynamic sorting buffer system for efficient order processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a dynamic goods-to-person system is implemented, then automation and picking efficiency are improved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepicking efficiencyVSAvoidlogistics system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into independent picking stations, each capable of autonomous operation. Goods are segmented into individual items that can be handled separately by robotic pickers at different stations, allowing parallel processing without requiring a fully integrated complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A buffer unit is introduced as an intermediary between the goods feed and removal device. This buffer acts as a decoupling element that absorbs fluctuations in the system, allowing the robotic pickers to operate independently without directly coupling all system components, thereby reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If buffering capability is increased to prevent system standstill, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem continuityVSAvoidbuffering structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The buffer unit serves multiple functions: it buffers goods to prevent standstills, provides sorting capability for different destinations, and acts as a temporary storage for robotic pickers. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components for each function, thereby limiting complexity increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The buffer unit utilizes vertical space with multiple levels or layers for buffering goods, rather than expanding horizontally. This dimensional approach allows adequate buffering capacity without proportionally increasing the footprint and structural complexity of the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple removal stations are added to handle diverse orders, then adaptability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder handling capabilityVSAvoidremoval station configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamically controllable removal stations that can be activated or deactivated based on current order requirements. The buffer unit can dynamically redirect goods to different removal stations, allowing the system to adapt to diverse orders without requiring all stations to be permanently configured and active, thereby managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Goods are pre-sorted and positioned in the buffer unit according to their destination before being transferred to removal stations. This preliminary action at the buffer reduces the complexity at removal stations, as they receive pre-prepared goods rather than needing to sort everything from scratch, simplifying their configuration and operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If conveyor speed is increased to improve throughput, then productivity is improved, but risk of conveyor jams and disruptions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegoods throughputVSAvoidconveyor operation stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The buffer unit provides a cushioning effect by absorbing sudden variations in goods flow from the conveyor. When the conveyor operates at high speed, the buffer accumulates excess goods temporarily, preventing backpressure and jams that would otherwise occur, thereby maintaining conveyor stability despite high-speed operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The buffer unit acts as an intermediary between the high-speed conveyor and the removal stations. It decouples the conveyor's high-speed operation from the variable-rate removal process, allowing the conveyor to maintain high speed without directly transmitting speed variations and potential jams to the rest of the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP4242142A1Device, method and system for commissioning piece goods
Publication Date: 2023.09.13 FERAG AG
  • EP4242142A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4242142A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4242142A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A device for picking goods (2), with a goods feed (3), comprising a picking device (10) with at least one picking point (11) for unloading goods (2), and a picking handling module (20) to which the goods (2) are transferred from the picking device (10), wherein the picking handling module (20) comprises at least one goods receiving element (21, 31, 81) and a movement element (22, 32) for transferring the goods (2) to a downstream conveying unit (30).