Buffer State Reporting for Latency-Aware Data Burst Alignment
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing XR systems face challenges in maintaining quality of service (QoS) and power efficiency due to limited control over wireless communication durations, leading to latency issues and data discard, especially in devices like portable user equipment (UE), which lack sufficient latency information for effective scheduling.
Innovation Solution
Implementing buffer state reporting and latency-aware scheduling to determine the remaining time for data packets in a buffer, allowing network devices to schedule transmissions effectively while managing power usage, by using wireless communication interfaces and processors to transmit latency-related signals.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Use of energy by moving object
If wireless communications are controlled or limited in duration for power saving, then power consumption is reduced, but quality of service (latency) deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The UE provides buffer state information with latency indicators to the network device, creating a feedback loop that enables the network to adjust scheduling decisions based on real-time buffer conditions and latency requirements, thereby resolving the contradiction between power saving and QoS
Solution Approach 2:
The UE proactively reports buffer state information before data packets are discarded due to latency violations, allowing the network to take preliminary scheduling actions that prevent QoS degradation while maintaining power efficiency
2Loss of time
If data is transmitted according to periodic schedule, then data delivery timing is improved, but data is discarded after usefulness expires
Solution Approach 1:
The system transitions from static periodic scheduling to dynamic scheduling based on real-time buffer state reporting with latency indicators, allowing the network to adapt transmission timing to actual data freshness requirements and prevent transmission of expired data
3Device complexity
If network devices provide timing instructions without latency information, then scheduling control is simplified, but QoS factors are not considered
Solution Approach 1:
The UE includes latency indicators in buffer state reports, providing the network device with QoS-relevant information that enables latency-aware scheduling decisions without significantly increasing system complexity
Solution Approach 2:
The buffer state information with latency indicators acts as an intermediary that bridges the UE and network device, conveying QoS requirements in a format that maintains scheduling control simplicity while enabling QoS consideration
Data Source
AI summary
Disclosed herein are aspects related to a device that can include a wireless communication interface and one or more processors. The one or more processors can generate a plurality of data packets. The one or more processors can allocate the plurality of data packets to a buffer for transmission to a network device. The one or more processors can determine an indication of a remaining time for transmission of at least one data packet of the plurality of data packets. The one or more processors can cause transmission, using the wireless communications interface, of the indication of the remaining time to the network device.


