Buffer Validity Check via Timestamp Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional buffer invalidation strategies in software architectures, particularly in multi-tenant systems, face challenges in identifying and managing metadata validity due to complex lifecycle management events and interdependencies, leading to instability and inefficiency.

Innovation Solution

A buffer validity check algorithm that compares the most recent buffer validity timestamp with the most recent lifecycle management event timestamp, allowing for efficient identification of invalid metadata without reading all buffer content, and only requiring execution during lifecycle events, thus simplifying the process and improving robustness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional buffer invalidation strategies are used to manage metadata validity, then buffer synchronization can be maintained, but system complexity and processing overhead increase due to complex lifecycle management events and interdependencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebuffer synchronizationVSAvoidlifecycle management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the buffer invalidation logic from the complex lifecycle management system by introducing a separate timestamp comparison mechanism. The lifecycle management events continue to occur, but their impact on the buffer is determined solely by comparing timestamps rather than analyzing complex interdependencies, thus simplifying the invalidation process while maintaining synchronization reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a timestamp as an intermediary element between lifecycle management events and buffer invalidation. Instead of directly analyzing the complex relationships between lifecycle events and buffer content, the timestamp serves as a mediator that encapsulates the state changes, enabling simple comparison to determine when buffer invalidation is required without reanalyzing the complex event history.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If buffer content is read and validated during lifecycle events, then metadata validity can be ensured, but processor resource usage and execution time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetadata validityVSAvoidprocessor resource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the validation logic from the buffer content itself and places it in the timestamp comparison mechanism. Instead of reading and analyzing buffer content to determine validity, the system only compares timestamps to decide when validation is needed, significantly reducing processor resources spent on unnecessary reads and analyses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by updating timestamps during lifecycle events before they are needed for validity checks. This advance preparation allows the buffer validity determination to be made through simple timestamp comparison rather than requiring complex analysis at the time of validation, reducing processing overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive buffer validity checks are performed, then all metadata can be validated, but execution time and processing overhead increase during lifecycle events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidity check accuracyVSAvoidexecution time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential validity determination logic from comprehensive buffer checks by using timestamp comparison. Instead of reading and validating all buffer content, the system only compares timestamps to determine validity, achieving sufficient accuracy for metadata validation while dramatically reducing execution time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by performing only the necessary timestamp comparison rather than comprehensive buffer validation. This partial check is sufficient to determine buffer validity in the context of lifecycle events, avoiding the excessive time consumption of full buffer reads and analyses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8938645B2Invalidation of metadata buffers
Publication Date: 2015.01.20 SAP SE
  • US8938645B2 patent drawing
  • US8938645B2 patent drawing
  • US8938645B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A quick buffer validity check can optionally be performed when a potential invalidity of the content of a buffer is identified. The identifying of the potential invalidity condition can include determining that a most recent lifecycle management event timestamp is more recent than a most recent buffer validity check timestamp for the buffer. To determine whether the buffer contents need to be refreshed, a list of the last changed timestamps for the constituent elements of the buffer can be compared to a new list. If the new list and the old list are not identical, the buffer can be rebuilt.