Build-Integrated Security Scanning for Vulnerability Gating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing software development methodologies fail to effectively detect and address security vulnerabilities introduced during frequent application updates, leaving systems susceptible to exploitation due to infrequent penetration testing.

Innovation Solution

Integrate a scanning tool as a plugin component in the software development architecture to dynamically control the code build process, performing penetration tests during the build phase and terminating or completing the build based on vulnerability thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional penetration testing is performed on a scheduled basis (e.g., monthly or quarterly), then the testing process remains simple and manageable, but security vulnerabilities introduced during frequent application updates may remain undetected for prolonged periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity vulnerability detection timelinessVSAvoidapplication update frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The scanning tool is integrated into the build platform to perform penetration tests before application updates are deployed. This preliminary security testing ensures that vulnerabilities are detected early in the development cycle, preventing vulnerable updates from reaching production environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automated feedback loops where penetration test results directly influence build outcomes. When vulnerabilities are detected, the system provides feedback that triggers build termination or alerts developers, creating a closed-loop security verification process that continuously monitors and improves application security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If penetration testing is performed frequently to match application update frequency, then security vulnerability detection timeliness improves, but the complexity and resource consumption of the development process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity vulnerability detection timelinessVSAvoiddevelopment process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The scanning tool is merged with the existing build platform infrastructure, combining security testing functions with the continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipeline. This integration allows penetration testing to be performed automatically as part of the standard build process without requiring separate, complex testing infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service security testing where the build platform automatically triggers penetration tests, analyzes results, and makes decisions about build completion without requiring manual intervention. This automation reduces the complexity burden on developers while maintaining frequent security testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the scanning tool terminates the code build when vulnerabilities are detected, then security reliability improves, but development productivity decreases due to build interruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication security reliabilityVSAvoidcode build completion rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different quality standards to different parts of the development process. Critical security vulnerabilities trigger build termination with high priority, while less severe issues generate alerts that allow builds to continue. This differentiated approach ensures that only truly dangerous vulnerabilities block deployment, maintaining both security reliability and development productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Measurement precision

If the scanning tool prevents the code build from completing to perform penetrative tests, then security detection accuracy improves, but the build time and development cycle duration increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevulnerability detection accuracyVSAvoidcode build time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Penetration testing is performed preliminarily during the build phase before deployment. By conducting security tests early in the development cycle, the system achieves accurate vulnerability detection without delaying the actual deployment of secure applications, as vulnerable builds are terminated before they reach production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12400003B2Security tool integrated into build platform to identify vulnerabilities
Publication Date: 2025.08.26 SAFEOPS LLC
  • US12400003B2 patent drawing
  • US12400003B2 patent drawing
  • US12400003B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for dynamically controlling whether a code build of an application finishes to completion or is terminated prior to completion are disclosed. An application is determined to be entering a development state in which a code build of the application is to occur. After the code build for the application has started, the code build is prevented from completing by a scanning tool. While the code build is being prevented from completing, the scanning tool performs a scan of the application. Based on a result of the scan, the code build is terminated prior to completion.