3D Printer Build Module Sealing for Inert Atmosphere Printing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing 3D printing technologies face challenges in preventing exposure of starting materials and remnants to ambient atmospheric conditions, such as oxygen or humidity, which can affect the printing process and the quality of the 3D objects produced.

Innovation Solution

The method involves a controlled environment using a build module and a processing chamber with separate atmospheres, where the build module is reversibly sealed and can be engaged and disengaged from the processing chamber without human intervention, using a first and second controller to manage the printing process and maintain an inert atmosphere, allowing for efficient printing of 3D objects using granular materials like metals, ceramics, or carbon.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the build module is sealed and engaged with the processing chamber to maintain inert atmosphere, then material degradation is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial stabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into separate modules: a build module for 3D printing and a processing chamber for material storage and post-processing. Each module can be independently sealed and controlled, allowing the inert atmosphere to be maintained only where needed rather than throughout the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A load lock chamber serves as an intermediary between the build module and the processing chamber. This intermediate chamber allows for atmosphere transitions and module engagement/disengagement without compromising the inert atmosphere in the build module, simplifying the overall sealing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If automated engagement and disengagement of build module is implemented, then operator exposure to starting material is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator exposureVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The build module is equipped with self-aligning engagement features including guide rails, positioning pins, and interlocking mechanisms that enable automated coupling and decoupling with the processing chamber without requiring complex robotic manipulation or precise manual alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Magnetic coupling mechanisms are used to replace complex mechanical fastening systems for the engagement between build module and processing chamber. The magnetic attraction provides secure holding force while allowing for simple approach and separation, reducing the complexity of automated handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If separate controllers are used for build module and processing chamber, then operational flexibility is improved, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each controller is designed with a standardized interface and protocol that allows it to perform multiple functions: controlling atmosphere parameters, managing module engagement, coordinating printing operations, and monitoring system status. This universal design reduces the need for specialized control circuits for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The controllers are equipped with sensors that continuously monitor atmosphere composition, pressure, and module engagement status. This feedback allows the controllers to automatically adjust their operations and coordinate with each other, simplifying the control logic despite having separate control units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If continuous printing is enabled with minimal intervention, then productivity increases, but reliability requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting throughputVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows the build module to remain sealed and maintain inert atmosphere throughout the entire printing process without requiring opening or intervention. Multiple build modules can be sequentially engaged with the processing chamber, enabling continuous production while each module operates independently and reliably.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

Redundant atmosphere control systems and pre-programmed error handling routines are built into the controllers to anticipate and respond to potential failures before they affect printing quality. The system can automatically detect anomalies and take corrective action without operator intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach minimizes exposure to reactive atmospheric components, ensuring high-quality 3D object production with reduced material degradation and increased operational efficiency, enabling continuous printing with minimal operator intervention and maintaining a controlled atmosphere throughout the printing process.

Implementation Method 1

The build module may comprise a first conditioned atmosphere. The processing chamber may comprise a second conditioned atmosphere.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInert atmosphere:

Implementation Method 2

engaging a build module with a processing chamber, wherein the build module comprises a platform, wherein the build module is controlled by a first controller

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical engagement:

Implementation Method 3

printing a 3D object according to a 3D printing method by using the second controller, which 3D object is disposed adjacent to the platform and in the build module

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdditive manufacturing:

Implementation Method 4

a first layer of hardened material is formed (e.g., by welding powder), and thereafter successive layers of hardened material are added one by one

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLayer-wise materialization:

Implementation Method 5

The build module may be reversibly sealable by a first shutter. The processing chamber may be reversibly sealable by a second shutter.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical containment: Physical Containment

Implementation Method 6

A load lock volume can be formed in operation (b) between the build module and the processing chamber.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure equalization:

Data Source

PatentUS11691343B2Three-dimensional printing and three-dimensional printers
Publication Date: 2023.07.04 VELO3D INC
  • US11691343B2 patent drawing
  • US11691343B2 patent drawing
  • US11691343B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides three-dimensional (3D) printing processes, apparatuses, software, and systems for the production of at least one desired 3D object. The 3D printer system (e.g., comprising a processing chamber, build module, or an unpacking station) described herein may retain a desired (e.g., inert) atmosphere around the material bed and/or 3D object at multiple 3D printing stages. The 3D printer described herein comprises one or more build modules that may have a controller separate from the controller of the processing chamber. The 3D printer described herein comprises a platform that may be automatically constructed. The invention(s) described herein may allow the 3D printing process to occur for a long time without operator intervention and/or down time.