Build Promotion Scoring for Stable Software Package Compilation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge in software development is the difficulty in testing and selecting appropriate versions of software components due to frequent changes, leading to delays and persistence of defects in the software package.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for automatically determining optimal versions of software artifacts based on test results and user ratings, using a recommendation agent to generate a recommended software package for compilation and delivery to a client device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If software components are frequently changed during development, then the software package can be continuously improved and updated, but it becomes difficult to test certain aspects of the software package, causing delays and persistence of defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware component flexibilityVSAvoidsoftware package stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the software package into individual artifacts and versions, allowing independent analysis and selection of each component. The build promotion agent evaluates each artifact version separately based on test results, enabling controlled integration of changes without compromising overall package stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of artifact version selection by using promotion scores derived from test results. Instead of manually selecting versions, the system automatically determines which artifact versions to promote based on quantitative metrics from defect tests and code churn tests, resolving the conflict between flexibility and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple versions of artifacts are tested and evaluated, then the optimal software package can be identified, but the complexity of managing and analyzing test results increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveartifact version evaluation accuracyVSAvoidtest result management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple test results (defect tests and code churn tests) into a single promotion score for each artifact version. This consolidation simplifies the management of test results by providing a unified metric that captures both quality and stability aspects, reducing the complexity of analyzing multiple separate test outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where test results automatically generate promotion scores that inform version selection decisions. The build promotion agent continuously receives test result feedback and adjusts artifact version promotions accordingly, creating a self-regulating system that reduces manual analysis complexity while maintaining high evaluation precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated determination of artifact versions is implemented, then the development process is enhanced and defects are reduced, but additional processing and analysis steps are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevelopment process efficiencyVSAvoidcompilation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The build promotion agent operates autonomously to determine optimal artifact versions without requiring manual intervention. The system self-services by automatically collecting test results, calculating promotion scores, and selecting artifact versions for compilation, thereby enhancing productivity despite the added processing steps through automation rather than manual complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250348291A1Automated build promotion for a software package
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 DELL PROD LP
  • US20250348291A1 patent drawing
  • US20250348291A1 patent drawing
  • US20250348291A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for compiling a software package includes identifying a first artifact and a second artifact, a first version and a second version associated with the first artifact, and a third version and a fourth version associated with the second artifact. The method includes receiving a set of test results that includes a defect test result and a code churn result for each of the versions. The method includes determining, based on the set of test results, a promotion score set that includes a promotion score for each of the versions. The method includes generating, based on the promotion score set, a recommended software package that includes the first version of the first artifact and the fourth version of the second artifact. The method includes compiling the recommended software package to obtain a compiled software package and sending the compiled software package to the client device.