Build Script Analysis for Tiered CI/CD Security Enforcement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

CI/CD pipelines lack adequate security measures, allowing malicious actors to exploit vulnerabilities in source code and spread attacks throughout the software supply chain, and existing solutions fail to provide continuous monitoring and enforcement of security policies beyond the build phase.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for enforcing security policies in dynamic development pipelines by analyzing build scripts to identify expected actions, constructing a security policy, and monitoring the pipeline environment, including the use of machine learning algorithms to detect and prevent malicious activities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If security monitoring is limited to the build phase and build machine, then device complexity is reduced, but security coverage is insufficient allowing attacks at multiple pipeline points

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal security monitoring system that functions across multiple CI/CD pipeline phases (source, build, test, deploy) and multiple targets (machines, repositories, libraries). The security policy enforcement mechanism serves universal purposes: monitoring build scripts, enforcing policies, detecting attacks, and blocking malicious actions across the entire pipeline environment, not just isolated to the build phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments security monitoring into distinct pipeline phases (source, build, test, deploy) and targets (build machines, repositories, libraries). Each phase has specific monitoring capabilities tailored to its characteristics, while the central security policy enforcement coordinates across all segments. This segmentation allows comprehensive coverage without overwhelming system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If security policies are generated based on comprehensive analysis of build scripts, then security precision is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity policy precisionVSAvoidpolicy generation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary analysis of build scripts to generate security policies before the actual build execution. By analyzing the build script beforehand, the system constructs a representation of expected build actions and generates security policies in advance, allowing the build process to proceed without delays while maintaining high security precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual or exhaustive security analysis with automated machine learning algorithms and AI models. These intelligent systems efficiently analyze build scripts, identify expected actions, and generate security policies without the time-consuming manual processes, achieving both high precision and rapid policy generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If automated security monitoring is implemented across the pipeline, then security enforcement is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity enforcementVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a security policy enforcement mechanism as an intermediary layer between the build script execution and the pipeline environment. This intermediary monitors build script actions, compares them against expected actions defined in security policies, and blocks or allows actions accordingly. It provides automated security enforcement without requiring complex direct integration with every pipeline component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the security monitoring system continuously observes build script execution, compares actual actions against expected actions, and provides real-time enforcement decisions. The system learns from detected attacks and security events, refining its monitoring and enforcement capabilities while maintaining manageable complexity through adaptive rather than purely static rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4276665B1Analyzing scripts to create and enforce security policies in dynamic development pipelines
Publication Date: 2026.04.01 CYBER ARK SOFTWARE LTD
  • EP4276665B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4276665B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4276665B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Disclosed embodiments relate to systems and methods for enforcing security policies in dynamic development pipelines. Techniques include accessing a build script, including a set of instructions for a software build process, parsing the build script to identify a set of scripted build instructions, determining a set of expected build actions based on the scripted build instructions, and constructing a representation of the set of expected build actions. The techniques may further include automatically generating a tiered security policy based on the representation of the set of expected build actions, monitoring a dynamic pipeline running the build script, and enforcing the security policy for the dynamic pipeline environment.