Building control systems with optimization of equipment life cycle economic value while participating in IBDR and PBDR programs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing central plant systems face challenges in optimizing the distribution of thermal energy loads across multiple subplants to minimize energy costs, particularly when considering electrical demand charges and equipment efficiency, which is highly dependent on control technology.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for allocating resources, including electrical energy storage and thermal energy storage, using a controller to optimize resource allocation across equipment to maximize economic value by predicting and minimizing battery degradation, participating in demand response programs, and considering equipment start/stop penalties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If electrical energy storage is used to participate in demand response programs and optimize energy cost, then energy cost is reduced, but battery degradation occurs reducing equipment lifespan

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy costVSAvoidbattery lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by charging batteries during off-peak hours before peak demand periods, and by performing maintenance actions before equipment failure occurs. The controller predicts future energy costs and battery degradation trends, allowing proactive optimization of charge/discharge cycles to balance cost reduction with lifespan preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes operational parameters of the battery system based on real-time conditions. The controller adjusts charge/discharge rates, voltage thresholds, and temperature management parameters to optimize the balance between energy cost reduction and battery degradation minimization, adapting to changing energy prices and battery health states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If equipment is operated at high efficiency modes to reduce energy consumption, then energy efficiency is improved, but equipment wear increases reducing reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidequipment reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts equipment operating modes rather than maintaining fixed high-efficiency operation. The controller monitors equipment condition in real-time and dynamically switches between efficiency-optimized modes and reliability-protected modes based on equipment health status, load conditions, and energy price signals, allowing the system to adapt its operational characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements periodic operation cycles that alternate between high-efficiency operation and rest/recovery periods. Equipment operates at optimized efficiency levels for predetermined intervals, then enters lower-stress operational phases or idle states to allow recovery, preventing continuous high-stress operation that would degrade reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple subplants are used to distribute thermal energy loads, then load distribution flexibility is improved, but control complexity increases making optimization difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload distribution flexibilityVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements comprehensive feedback mechanisms where the controller continuously monitors the state of multiple subplants, energy prices, load demands, and equipment conditions. This real-time feedback enables the controller to automatically adjust the operation of each subplant, optimizing the distribution of thermal energy loads across the fleet while accounting for varying efficiency characteristics and operational constraints of individual units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables each subplant to effectively manage its own operation based on controller directives, where individual subplants self-adjust their output based on their own efficiency characteristics and current conditions. The controller distributes optimization goals to subplants, which then self-regulate their operational parameters to achieve collective optimization without requiring complex centralized coordination of every parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12560346B2Building control systems with optimization of equipment life cycle economic value while participating in IBDR and PBDR programs
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 JOHNSON CONTROLS TECHNOLOGY CO
  • US12560346B2 patent drawing
  • US12560346B2 patent drawing
  • US12560346B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes determining control setpoints for equipment based on a time-varying availability of green energy and revenue from an incentive program of an energy provider. The method also includes controlling the equipment using the control setpoints.