Geofence plus schedule for a building controller

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing building control systems lack additional control options when determining occupancy, particularly when transitioning between occupied and unoccupied states, leading to inefficiencies in energy usage.

Innovation Solution

A method combining geofencing and time-based scheduling to control building systems, where a mobile device's location is used to determine occupancy, switching between AWAY and HOME settings based on geofence presence and time-based schedules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If geofencing is used to determine occupancy, then energy efficiency is improved by avoiding conditioning of unoccupied spaces, but control flexibility is reduced when the building is determined to be occupied

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control system segments the occupied state into multiple time periods with different settings. When the building is determined to be occupied via geofencing, the system divides the day into distinct time periods (e.g., morning, afternoon, evening) and applies different HVAC settings to each period, thereby restoring control flexibility while maintaining energy efficiency benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between geofence-based control and time-based schedule control. When occupants are detected inside the geofence, the system dynamically adapts by applying time-based schedules with multiple settings throughout the day, rather than using a single static setting, thus providing both energy efficiency and control flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If a single occupied setpoint is used when the building is occupied, then system simplicity is maintained, but energy efficiency is reduced due to lack of optimization across different times of day

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic action by dividing the occupied period into multiple time periods with different settings. Instead of applying a single continuous occupied setpoint, the system periodically changes settings according to predetermined time periods (e.g., higher cooling during daytime, lower cooling during evening), optimizing energy efficiency while maintaining system simplicity through automated schedule-based control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP3488157B1Geofence plus schedule for a building controller
Publication Date: 2025.09.03 RESIDEO LLC
  • EP3488157B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3488157B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3488157B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A building control system that uses geofencing in conjunction with a timebased schedule when control one or more building systems. In one example, geofencing may be used to determine if the building is occupied or unoccupied. If the building is determined to be unoccupied via geofencing, the building controller may control to an unoccupied setpoint. If the building is determined to be occupied via geofencing, the HVAC controller may control in accordance with a time-based schedule.