Prefabricated Building Element Assembly for Deeper Component Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing prefabricated building elements have a high degree of manual processing and limited flexibility, with shallow integration of components, requiring significant manual effort during assembly.

Innovation Solution

A method for producing multi-part building elements involving the use of supporting elements and slab-shaped components, where the slab-shaped components are processed in prefabrication lines to match the dimensions of the support structure, allowing for high flexibility in design and assembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual processing steps are used in current production methods, then ease of operation is maintained, but productivity is reduced and manufacturing precision is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidmanual processing requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The building element is divided into multiple pre-fabricated components (support structure, slab-shaped components, integrated elements) that are manufactured separately in modular units and then assembled. This segmentation enables parallel production processes, increasing overall productivity while reducing manual labor requirements for each individual component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Components are pre-assembled and pre-positioned during the manufacturing process before final assembly at the construction site. The support structure and slab-shaped components are prepared in advance with predetermined configurations, reducing on-site manual work and accelerating the overall production and assembly process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If inflexible production methods are used, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign flexibilityVSAvoidproduction system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The production system employs universal modules and standardized interfaces that can accommodate various building element configurations. The same basic manufacturing equipment and assembly procedures can produce different types of building elements by changing the input components and assembly sequences, providing design flexibility without requiring completely different production lines for each variant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The production method allows for dynamic adjustment of component configurations, sizes, and arrangements during the manufacturing process. The support structure and slab-shaped components can be adapted to different specifications through programmable positioning systems and adjustable assembly parameters, enabling versatile production while maintaining a relatively simple base equipment structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If shallow integration of components is used, then ease of manufacture is improved, but integration depth is reduced requiring high manual effort during assembly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly effortVSAvoidcomponent integration depth
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple functional components are merged into integrated units during manufacturing. The slab-shaped components are combined with support structure elements and other building components into single pre-assembled units with predetermined connections. This merging reduces the number of separate assembly operations required at the construction site, decreasing manual effort while increasing the degree of automation in the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Components are nested within each other during assembly, with smaller elements positioned within or between larger structural components. The support structure, slab-shaped components, and integrated elements are arranged in nested configurations that simplify handling and assembly operations, reducing manual effort while enabling complex integrated designs through automated positioning systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS20250196278A1Method for producing building elements
Publication Date: 2025.06.19 WEINMANN HOLZBAUSYSTEMTECHNIK GMBH
  • US20250196278A1 patent drawing
  • US20250196278A1 patent drawing
  • US20250196278A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for producing multi-part building elements comprising a plurality of supporting elements, comprising the following operating steps: Positioning supporting elements on a work table and fastening them to one another in such a manner that a support structure is created; providing and depositing a slab-shaped component on the supporting building element, wherein the slab-shaped component is deposited in such a manner that the support structure is at least approximately covered on the side to be deposited; and fastening the slab-shaped component to the supporting elements. This makes it possible for the first time to provide an improved method with a higher flexibility and/or with a greater integration depth of components, for producing multi-part building elements.