Automated Building Element Placement Using Space Bodies and Gaps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The conventional manual positioning and connecting of building elements in construction planning and design using CAD/CAE systems are time-consuming, prone to errors, and sensitive to changes in architectural or infrastructure models.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that defines space bodies and gaps within a building model, generates placement rules based on physical characteristics and face classifications, and automatically places building elements using interior and exterior point clouds scanned by scanning machines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual positioning and connecting of building elements is used in CAD/CAE systems, then flexibility and control in placement are improved, but time consumption and error probability increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in placementVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically generating space bodies from architectural models and pre-defining placement rules based on gap analysis before actual element placement. This preliminary processing enables rapid automated placement while maintaining design flexibility, resolving the contradiction between manual control and time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces space bodies and gap analysis as intermediary structures that mediate between the architectural model and building element placement. These intermediaries automatically generate placement rules that preserve design intent while enabling high-speed automated placement, thus reducing time consumption without sacrificing operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual positioning and connecting of building elements is used, then adaptability to design changes is improved, but error probability and sensitivity to model changes increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to design changesVSAvoiderror probability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where gap analysis continuously monitors spatial relationships and automatically adjusts placement rules when architectural models change. This feedback loop maintains reliability by detecting and correcting potential errors while preserving adaptability to design modifications through automated rule regeneration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes parameters of placement rules based on gap characteristics and architectural model modifications. When design changes occur, the system automatically updates gap analysis results and regenerates placement rules, maintaining reliability through parameter adaptation while enabling versatility in responding to different design scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If automated placement systems are used to reduce time consumption, then productivity is improved, but complexity of the placement system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplacement speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the automated placement system into distinct functional modules: space body generation, gap analysis, placement rule generation, and element placement execution. This segmentation enables high productivity through automated processing while managing complexity by organizing functions into independent, manageable components that can be developed and maintained separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Manufacturing precision

If comprehensive gap analysis and face classification are performed to improve placement accuracy, then manufacturing precision is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplacement accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by performing detailed gap analysis and face classification only at specific critical locations where building elements will be placed, rather than uniformly across the entire model. This approach achieves high placement accuracy at placement sites while reducing overall computational complexity by focusing detailed analysis only where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240070337A1Building element placement using space bodies and gaps
Publication Date: 2024.02.29 TRIMBLE INC
  • US20240070337A1 patent drawing
  • US20240070337A1 patent drawing
  • US20240070337A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for placing a set of building elements within a building model. A set of space bodies are defined within a building, where each of the set of space bodies represents a non-overlapping volume within the building. A set of gaps are formed between the set of space bodies. A set of placement rules for the set of building elements are obtained based on physical characteristics of the set of gaps. A set of placements for the set of building elements within the building model are generated in accordance with the set of placement rules.