Building Information Management System for Component Issue Diagnosis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face challenges in accurately diagnosing and resolving building issues, such as malfunctioning components in fire suppression systems, due to lack of comprehensive information about installed components and systems, leading to inefficient service requests and potential safety hazards.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based system that manages building information, including component details and warranties, assists users in identifying problematic components, determines urgency, and facilitates service requests by matching issues with qualified service providers, using visual and location-based data analysis and augmented reality for component identification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If users manually manage building component information and service requests, then service technicians can be contacted to resolve issues, but the process becomes inefficient and time-consuming without comprehensive building information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice request resolution efficiencyVSAvoidtime to diagnose and resolve building issues
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically collecting, organizing, and storing comprehensive building information (component details, warranties, locations) before service requests are made. This pre-established information foundation enables rapid issue resolution without manual data gathering delays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where service outcomes are tracked and used to continuously improve the building information database. This creates a self-enhancing system where each service request makes future diagnostics faster and more accurate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive building information is collected and managed, then accurate component identification and warranty tracking are enabled, but the system complexity and data management burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of component identification and issue diagnosisVSAvoidcomplexity of building information management system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a centralized building management system as an intermediary that automatically collects, standardizes, and organizes building information from multiple sources. This intermediary layer shields users from raw data complexity while providing structured, accessible information for accurate diagnostics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates digital copies of physical building components, warranties, and service histories in a standardized database format. These digital replicas enable precise tracking and analysis without requiring physical inspection or manual documentation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Speed

If service technicians are dispatched without verified component information, then quick response is possible, but wrong diagnostics and ineffective repairs may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of service technician responseVSAvoidaccuracy of issue diagnosis and repair effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary diagnostics and component identification automatically before technician dispatch. Building information, component locations, and warranty status are pre-retrieved and presented to technicians, enabling immediate accurate action upon arrival

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system skips traditional time-consuming diagnostic steps by using pre-collected building information to directly identify problematic components. This allows technicians to bypass routine inspection phases and focus immediately on verified issues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

4Ease of operation

If warranty information is tracked manually, then warranty claims can be processed, but the process becomes cumbersome and warranty status may be lost or misunderstood

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of warranty claim processingVSAvoidwarranty status tracking accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback tracking of warranty status, automatically updating component information and service histories. This ensures warranty claims are processed with current, accurate information and prevents loss or misunderstanding of warranty conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Warranty information is digitized and stored as permanent records in the building management system, creating reliable copies that can be instantly retrieved for claims processing without manual document handling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11615490B2Managing building information and resolving building issues
Publication Date: 2023.03.28 TABOR MOUNTAIN LLC
  • US11615490B2 patent drawing
  • US11615490B2 patent drawing
  • US11615490B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are systems and methods for identifying issues in a building. In one aspect, a method includes receiving information describing an issue with a building, accessing data that identifies (i) a plurality of components that are included in the building and (ii) features of the plurality of components, identifying one or more candidate components that have at least a threshold likelihood of being a cause of the issue, and performing some action in response to remedy the issue. For example, the method can include selecting a candidate service provider from among a plurality of service providers based on a comparison of (i) the one or more candidate components and (ii) information identifying technical qualifications for the plurality of service providers, transmitting a service request for the issue to the candidate service provider, receiving a response from the candidate service provider, and scheduling, based on the response, a service appointment.