Dynamic Building Load Curtailment for Peak Demand Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing energy management systems face challenges in dynamically adjusting energy consumption to minimize peak demand, often requiring extensive tuning and retuning due to seasonal changes, leading to potential occupant disruption if not properly calibrated.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic load curtailment algorithm that learns optimum energy consumption conditions for a building, employing separate control schemes for HVAC and non-HVAC loads, using historical peak demand measurements to predict and strategically curtail loads within user-configured parameters, ensuring efficient operation while minimizing peak demand.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If load curtailment is implemented using schedule or threshold basis, then energy consumption is reduced, but extensive tuning and retuning are required due to seasonal changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidtuning complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-tuning by automatically learning occupancy patterns and thermal characteristics of the building over time. The controller adapts setback schedules and temperature setpoints based on historical data without requiring manual intervention or retuning for seasonal changes, thereby reducing energy consumption while eliminating tuning complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The load curtailment system transitions from static schedule/threshold-based control to dynamic adaptive control. The system continuously learns and adjusts to changing building conditions, occupancy patterns, and seasonal variations, enabling energy reduction without requiring manual retuning while maintaining comfort within learned parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If load curtailment is implemented without proper tuning, then system operation is simplified, but occupant disruption occurs due to excessive curtailment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operationVSAvoidoccupant comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically learns acceptable comfort parameters and occupancy patterns through continuous monitoring of building responses to curtailment actions. This self-learning capability enables the system to operate without manual tuning while reliably maintaining occupant comfort by adapting to actual building characteristics and occupancy behaviors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements closed-loop feedback by monitoring building temperature responses, occupancy patterns, and comfort conditions. This feedback enables the controller to learn optimal curtailment strategies that maintain reliability and occupant comfort while simplifying operation, as the system automatically adjusts based on observed building behavior and occupancy feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If manual tuning is used to optimize curtailment, then curtailment accuracy is improved, but time and effort for tuning and retuning are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurtailment accuracyVSAvoidtuning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-tuning by automatically learning building thermal characteristics, occupancy patterns, and optimal curtailment strategies through continuous operation. This eliminates the need for manual tuning and retuning while maintaining high curtailment accuracy, as the system adapts to building-specific behaviors and seasonal changes autonomously over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary learning during initial operation to establish baseline building characteristics and occupancy patterns. This preliminary action enables accurate curtailment from the outset without requiring subsequent manual tuning, as the system proactively learns and adapts to building-specific conditions during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8862280B1Dynamic load curtailment system and method
Publication Date: 2014.10.14 GRIDPOINT INC
  • US8862280B1 patent drawing
  • US8862280B1 patent drawing
  • US8862280B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system that dynamically learns the optimum energy consumption operating condition for a building and monitors/controls energy consuming equipment to keep the peak demand interval at a minimum. The algorithm employs two separate control schemes, one for HVAC loads and one for non-HVAC loads, and uses historical peak demand measurements in its real-time limiting strategy. The algorithm continuously attempts to reduce peak demand within user configured parameters. When a new peak is inevitable, the algorithm removes and/or introduces loads to limit the new peak magnitude and places the operating conditions within the user configured parameters. The algorithm can examine the previous seven days of metering information to identify a peak demand interval, use real-time load information to predict the demand peak of the upcoming interval, and curtail loads in order to limit the demand peak so as not to set a new peak.