Integrated Building Load Control for Demand Response Energy Savings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current load control systems lack a comprehensive solution to simultaneously manage lighting intensities, motorized window treatments, and building temperature to effectively reduce total power consumption, especially during peak demand periods.

Innovation Solution

A load control system that integrates a lighting control device, a daylight control device, and a controller to adjust the setpoint temperature of the heating and cooling system in response to demand response commands, automatically reducing power consumption by controlling lighting, window treatments, and HVAC operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If load shedding technique is used to monitor and adjust power consumption, then total power consumption can be reduced, but the system requires manual intervention and complex monitoring infrastructure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal power consumptionVSAvoidmonitoring infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller automatically receives demand response commands and executes control actions without manual intervention. The system self-regulates by adjusting lighting intensities, window treatment positions, and HVAC setpoint temperatures in response to utility company signals, eliminating the need for manual load shedding operations while reducing total power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where the controller continuously monitors power consumption levels and receives demand response commands from the utility company. Based on this feedback, the controller automatically adjusts lighting, window treatments, and HVAC systems to optimize power consumption while maintaining comfort levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of energy

If multiple control devices are integrated to manage lighting, window treatments, and HVAC, then energy savings are maximized, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidsystem integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller serves multiple functions by managing lighting control devices, window treatment control devices, and HVAC systems through a single integrated platform. This multi-functional approach maximizes energy savings across all building systems while presenting a unified interface that simplifies overall system complexity compared to separate control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines control of lighting, window treatments, and HVAC systems into a single integrated control architecture. The controller merges these previously separate control functions into one unified system that receives demand response commands and coordinates adjustments across all building systems to maximize energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Power

If demand response commands are automatically executed, then peak power consumption is reduced, but the system requires automated control capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeak power consumptionVSAvoidautomated control
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The controller automatically receives demand response commands from the utility company and executes control actions without manual intervention. The system self-regulates by adjusting lighting intensities, window treatment positions, and HVAC setpoint temperatures in response to utility company signals, eliminating the need for manual load shedding operations while reducing total power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Loss of energy

If lighting intensities are reduced during demand response, then power consumption decreases, but the illumination quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidlighting quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines control of lighting, window treatments, and HVAC systems into a single integrated control architecture. The controller merges these previously separate control functions into one unified system that receives demand response commands and coordinates adjustments across all building systems to maximize energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9013059B2Load control system having an energy savings mode
Publication Date: 2015.04.21 LUTRON TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LLC
  • US9013059B2 patent drawing
  • US9013059B2 patent drawing
  • US9013059B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A load control system for a building having a lighting load, a window, and a heating and cooling system comprises a lighting control device for controlling the amount of power delivered to the lighting load, a daylight control device (such as a motorized window treatment) for adjusting the amount of natural light to be admitted through a window, and a controller for adjusting a setpoint temperature of the heating and cooling system to thus control a present temperature in the building. In response to receiving a demand response command, the controller controls the lighting control device, the daylight control device, and the heating and cooling system so as to decrease a total power consumption of the load control system. The load control system may comprise a controllable switching device for disconnecting power to or disconnecting the control lines to one or more components of the heating and cooling system.