Building Material Visualization System with High Color Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The design and prototyping of building materials are costly and time-consuming due to the iterative process of trial and error, and consumers cannot accurately visualize the characteristics and qualities of custom products until the final product is manufactured, which differs from the prototyping process.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes a database with adjustable parameters for building materials, allowing users to render images of contemplated building materials with high color and shadow accuracy, using calibrated photographs and metadata for realistic simulation, and enabling users to modify parameters for accurate visualization and design without the need for expensive manufacturing processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If prototyping is used to accurately review building material characteristics, then visualization accuracy is improved, but cost and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisualization accuracyVSAvoidlead time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital copy (rendered image) of the building material appearance based on photographs and metadata, allowing accurate visualization without physical prototyping. The rendering system replicates visual characteristics including color, texture, and lighting effects computationally, eliminating the need for time-consuming physical samples while maintaining visualization accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical prototyping process with a computational rendering system. Instead of physically manufacturing and reviewing material samples, the system uses image processing algorithms, metadata analysis, and computer graphics to generate realistic visualizations, substituting physical mechanisms with information-based processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If prototyping is used to review building material characteristics, then visualization accuracy is improved, but cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisualization accuracyVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates accurate digital replicas of building material appearances using rendered images generated from photographs and metadata. This digital copying approach eliminates the need for expensive physical prototyping while maintaining the ability to accurately review color, texture, and overall appearance characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the expensive mechanical prototyping process with a computational rendering system that uses image processing and metadata analysis. This replacement dramatically reduces costs by eliminating material, manufacturing, and logistics expenses associated with physical samples while preserving visualization accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If custom building materials are manufactured to visualize characteristics, then accurate review is possible, but the manufacturing process differs from final product production

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereview accuracyVSAvoidprocess compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates visual copies of the final building material appearance using rendered images generated from photographs taken during actual production and metadata from the manufacturing process. This approach allows accurate review of the final product characteristics without requiring separate prototyping manufacturing, ensuring the visualization reflects the actual production process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Reliability

If iterative trial and error is used in building material design, then design quality is improved, but time consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign qualityVSAvoiddesign speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary visualization by generating rendered images early in the design process using initial photographs and metadata, before final design decisions are made. This allows designers to evaluate and adjust design parameters virtually, reducing the need for iterative physical prototyping and accelerating the overall design cycle while maintaining quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables rapid iteration by creating multiple digital copies (rendered images) with different design parameters based on the same underlying photograph and metadata. Designers can quickly compare various design options visually without the time-consuming process of manufacturing physical samples for each iteration, significantly improving design productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11151752B1System for visualization of a building material
Publication Date: 2021.10.19 CERTAINTEED LLC
  • US11151752B1 patent drawing
  • US11151752B1 patent drawing
  • US11151752B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for rendering a building material comprising a database including an adjustable parameter relating to a characteristic of a contemplated building material, wherein the system is adapted to provide a rendered image of the contemplated building material, wherein the system is adapted to be used in conjunction with manufacturing of the building material, and wherein the rendered image has a ΔE, as measured according to a Color Test with respect to the building material, of less than 10, less than 8, less than 6, less than 5, less than 4, less than 3, less than 2, or even less than 1.