Building Retrofit ECM Selection Using Group Knapsack Algorithm

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) in building retrofitting face challenges due to an excessively large number of combinations, making it difficult to find an optimal set that maximizes energy savings within cost constraints, and struggle to prevent duplicate selection of detailed measures.

Innovation Solution

An analysis apparatus and method that uses a group knapsack algorithm to select a maximum of one detailed measure from multiple options for each ECM, ensuring no duplicates are selected, and prioritizes cost-effectiveness by sorting candidate detailed measures based on energy savings and cost, using a dynamic programming table to optimize ECM selection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the number of ECM combinations is increased to provide more selection options, then the versatility of ECM selection is improved, but the calculation time and complexity increase exponentially

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveECM selection optionsVSAvoidcalculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the ECM selection problem into two distinct phases: (1) generating candidate ECMs by selecting at most one detailed measure from each ECM group, and (2) filtering optimal candidates using the knapsack algorithm based on budget constraints. This segmentation reduces the computational burden by avoiding exhaustive enumeration of all possible combinations while maintaining solution optimality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the original combinatorial optimization problem into a constrained selection problem by introducing the parameter 'at most one detailed measure per ECM group'. This parameter change fundamentally alters the search space from exponential to polynomial complexity, enabling efficient calculation while preserving the ability to provide diverse ECM selection options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If all possible ECM combinations are considered to ensure optimal selection, then the energy savings optimization is improved, but the device complexity and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimality of ECM selectionVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes redundant combinations from the search space by enforcing the constraint that at most one detailed measure can be selected from each ECM group. This extraction eliminates duplicate and invalid combinations before applying the knapsack algorithm, ensuring optimality while significantly reducing computational complexity and resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary filtering of ECM candidates before applying the optimization algorithm. By pre-selecting valid combinations that satisfy the 'at most one detailed measure per group' constraint, the system prepares a reduced candidate set that guarantees optimality when processed by the knapsack algorithm, avoiding the need to evaluate all possible combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of energy

If detailed measures for multiple ECMs are selected independently to maximize energy savings, then the energy conservation effectiveness is improved, but the probability of duplicate selection increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy savingsVSAvoiduniqueness of detailed measures
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by preventing duplicate selection of detailed measures across different ECM groups before the optimization process begins. The constraint 'at most one detailed measure per ECM group' acts as a preventive mechanism that eliminates the possibility of duplication, ensuring that each selected detailed measure is unique while still maximizing energy savings within the budget constraint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS10810500B2Apparatus and method for determining energy conservation measure for building retrofit
Publication Date: 2020.10.20 ELECTRONICS & TELECOMM RES INST
  • US10810500B2 patent drawing
  • US10810500B2 patent drawing
  • US10810500B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for determining an Energy Conservation Measure (ECM) for building retrofit. An analysis apparatus receives a condition for building retrofit, and selects detailed measures of one or more Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) for a building based on the condition. The analysis apparatus selects a maximum of one detailed measure from among multiple detailed measures of each of the one or more ECMs. The analysis apparatus provides one or more ECM determination schemes, which include an energy savings-based ECM determination scheme and a cost-based ECM determination scheme.