Building Security Assessment via Camera and RFID Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for assessing the security situation in buildings with access authorization areas are limited in simultaneously detecting physical presence and identification, often requiring continuous monitoring and separate access barriers, which can be inefficient and invasive.

Innovation Solution

A method using cameras with image processing and RFID readers distributed in ceiling and wall areas to automatically determine the number of physically present people and identified individuals, generating an indicator for the security situation, allowing for simultaneous detection and tracking of unauthorized individuals without the need for continuous monitoring or separate access barriers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If separate access barriers such as turnstiles and locks are used for access authorization, then access control reliability is improved, but device complexity and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess control reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the access barrier function with the monitoring system by integrating RFID readers and cameras into existing door frames and walls. The access authorization is performed through the monitoring system itself, eliminating the need for separate physical barriers like turnstiles and locks, thus reducing device complexity while maintaining access control reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system performs multiple functions: it monitors presence for security assessment and simultaneously performs access authorization by detecting RFID identifiers. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for dedicated access control devices, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining reliable access control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If continuous monitoring and tracking of persons is implemented, then security situation assessment is improved, but loss of time and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity situation assessmentVSAvoidcontinuous monitoring time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs monitoring and assessment periodically rather than continuously. The security situation is evaluated at specific intervals by counting persons and identifiers at that moment, which reduces time loss and energy consumption while still providing reliable security assessment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial monitoring by only counting persons and identifiers at specific moments rather than tracking their complete movements continuously. This partial action is sufficient for security assessment purposes and significantly reduces the time and energy required compared to continuous tracking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If high-resolution cameras are used for person identification, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of information (privacy) and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperson identification precisionVSAvoidprivacy information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses different imaging qualities for different purposes: low-resolution imaging for presence detection and counting (protecting privacy) and high-resolution imaging only when needed for identification purposes. This local differentiation of quality meets identification precision requirements only where necessary while preserving privacy in routine monitoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the resolution parameter of camera imaging based on the task at hand. For routine presence monitoring, low resolution is used to protect privacy; for identification tasks, high resolution is activated. This dynamic parameter adjustment balances measurement precision with privacy protection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables effective detection and tracking of unauthorized individuals, prioritizing security responses and optimizing resource allocation, while maintaining privacy through non-invasive means, such as low-resolution imaging and non-identifying presence counting.

Implementation Method 1

A current number of physically present people is automatically determined using cameras with downstream image processing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical imaging: Photography

Implementation Method 2

A current number of identifiers is determined in each case, which are read by means of RFID readers from RFID transponders

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRFID electromagnetic detection: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP2751794B1Evaluation of the security situation of location areas in buildings with access authorisation by means of cameras and RFID reading devices
Publication Date: 2017.08.16 SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG
  • EP2751794B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2751794B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2751794B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The invention relates to a method and a corresponding system for evaluating the security situation in a building (100), the building (100) having location areas with access authorisation for authorised persons (IP). In each case, only the current number (CP) of persons (P) who are physically present is determined automatically by means of cameras (1) with image processing that is activated downstream, the cameras (1) being arranged in a distributed manner in the ceiling and/or wall region of the location areas. The respective current number (CID) of identifiers (ID), which are read by RFID reading devices (2) of RFID transponders (4), is determined, the identifiers (ID) being carried by authorised persons (IP) in compliance with regulations. The RFID reading devices (2) are arranged in a distributed manner in the ceiling and/or wall region of the location areas. Finally, an indicator for evaluating the current security situation in the building (100) is determined and output on the basis of each of the two numbers (CP, CID).