Building Equipment Stability Index for Predictive Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing building management systems require a large number of data points and specific methods to determine equipment stability, which limits their applicability across different types of equipment.

Innovation Solution

A method for calculating a stability index based on a timeseries of errors between actual and setpoint values, allowing for fault detection and predictive control adjustments in building equipment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional building management systems use multiple data points and specific methods to determine equipment stability, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment stability determinationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential stability determination logic from complex traditional systems by isolating the core calculation to a single stability index formula that uses only two parameters (actual value and setpoint), eliminating the need for multiple data points and complex analysis methods while maintaining measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters used for stability determination from multiple complex data points to a simplified approach using only the actual value and setpoint difference, transforming the stability assessment into a straightforward calculation of deviation from target values

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If traditional methods use specific identification methods for particular equipment types, then measurement precision is improved, but adaptability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproblem detection accuracyVSAvoidequipment type applicability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal stability index calculation method that can be applied to any building equipment regardless of type, using the same fundamental approach of comparing actual values to setpoints, thereby achieving both measurement precision and broad adaptability across HVAC, lighting, security, and other building systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of developing specific identification methods for each equipment type, the patent inverts the approach by creating a single generic method that works for all equipment types, eliminating the need for equipment-specific algorithms while maintaining detection accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If a large number of data points are collected for equipment monitoring, then reliability is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment monitoring accuracyVSAvoiddata collection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using only the necessary minimum data points (actual value and setpoint) required for stability determination, avoiding the collection of excessive data while maintaining sufficient reliability for accurate equipment monitoring and fault detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12399490B2Performance monitoring and control system for connected building equipment with stability index
Publication Date: 2025.08.26 TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH
  • US12399490B2 patent drawing
  • US12399490B2 patent drawing
  • US12399490B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes obtaining an actual value of a condition affected by operating the building equipment, operating the building equipment using a setpoint for the condition, calculating a stability index based on a timeseries of errors between the actual value and the setpoint, comparing the stability index to a criterion, in response to the stability index satisfying the criterion, executing an action relating to the building equipment, and in response to the stability index not satisfying the criterion, not executing the action.