Built-Up I-Beam Assembly for Custom Lightweight Structural Beams

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Standardized structural steel components are limited in customization, leading to inefficiencies in specific use cases, as they cannot be tailored to meet the unique requirements of various applications.

Innovation Solution

A method of fabricating built-up beams by cutting web openings, flange openings, and bolt holes in I-beams to vary their cross-sectional profile, allowing them to be stacked and bolted together with beam spanning members, creating a customized, deep, yet lightweight structural configuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If standardized structural steel components are used, then manufacturing efficiency and consistency are improved, but customization capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidcustomization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The beam is divided into multiple I-beam subcomponents that can be independently manufactured using standardized processes, then assembled together. This segmentation allows each subcomponent to be produced efficiently through standardization while the overall beam configuration can be customized by selecting and arranging different subcomponents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple I-beam subcomponents are nested or stacked together to form a built-up beam. The subcomponents are positioned one on top of another and connected through bolt holes, creating a composite structure that combines the advantages of standardized manufacturing with customized structural properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Adaptability or versatility

If built-up steel components with multiple individual elements are used, then customization capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization capabilityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The built-up beam is segmented into standardized I-beam subcomponents with uniform cross-sectional profiles. This segmentation reduces complexity by using repeating, standardized elements rather than entirely custom-shaped components, while still achieving customization through the arrangement and configuration of these segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The I-beam subcomponents serve multiple functions: they provide structural strength, allow for customization through selective arrangement, and enable efficient manufacturing through standardized production. The universal I-beam design can be used in various configurations to meet different customization requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Weight of moving object

If web openings and flange openings are cut in I-beams, then weight is reduced, but structural strength deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam weightVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Openings are strategically positioned in specific locations of the I-beam web and flanges where material can be removed with minimal impact on overall structural strength. The local quality of the beam is optimized by maintaining material in critical load-bearing areas while removing material in less critical regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple I-beam subcomponents with openings are combined through bolting to form a built-up beam. The merging of subcomponents distributes structural loads across multiple elements, compensating for the strength reduction caused by openings in individual subcomponents while achieving overall weight reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the creation of customized, efficient structural beams that can be tailored for specific applications, offering improved load-carrying capacity and reduced weight, while allowing for easy assembly and disassembly.

Implementation Method 1

Cutting the plurality of web openings and the plurality flange openings in each I-beam may include CNC thermal cutting each of the openings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal cutting:

Data Source

PatentUS11236500B2Built-up beams and building structures
Publication Date: 2022.02.01 FOLDING HLDG
  • US11236500B2 patent drawing
  • US11236500B2 patent drawing
  • US11236500B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A built-up beam includes a pair of I-beams each having opposing flanges, a web that extends between the opposing flanges, a plurality of flange openings in each of the opposing flanges, a plurality of web openings in the web, and a plurality of bolt holes in one of the opposing flanges. The I-beams are stacked together flange-to-flange in a stacked beam configuration and a plurality of bolts extend through the plurality of bolt holes and secure the pair of I-beams together in the stacked beam configuration.