Built-Up Propeller With Tapered Blade Roots

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing propeller designs face challenges such as high production costs, complex manufacturing processes, and limited repairability due to the use of cast metal components and complex geometries, particularly when using composite materials, which restricts the use of interchangeable blades and efficient force transmission.

Innovation Solution

A built-up propeller design featuring a central supporting body with tapering propeller blades and detachable wing shoes made of composite materials, where the blades are securely fastened using standardized screw connections and metallic cores for enhanced force transmission, allowing for easy replacement and improved damping properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If propeller blades are made as single-piece cast metal parts, then production is relatively simple, but repair is not possible and replacement is expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction simplicityVSAvoidrepairability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The propeller is divided into separate components: a hub and detachable blades. The blades can be individually removed and replaced without replacing the entire propeller, enabling repair while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through standardized blade designs with tapered roots that fit into the hub.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If dovetail-shaped grooves are provided on the hub circumference for blade attachment, then blade connection is secure, but production becomes extremely complex and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection securityVSAvoidproduction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of providing complex dovetail grooves in the hub, the invention inverts the approach by providing the dovetail-shaped structure on the blade roots themselves. These tapered roots with transverse slots are inserted into simpler recesses in the hub, achieving secure form-fitting and force-locking connections while greatly simplifying hub manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If composite material blades are used, then damping properties improve and signature decreases, but force transmission becomes problematic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignature reductionVSAvoidforce transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The blades are constructed from composite materials (such as fiber-reinforced plastics) which provide superior damping properties and lower acoustic signature. The composite structure is designed with a tapered root section that includes a metallic core or reinforcement elements to ensure effective force transmission from the blade to the hub while maintaining the benefits of composite materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Ease of repair

If blades are detachably attached to the hub, then individual blade replacement is possible, but connection problems arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade replaceabilityVSAvoidconnection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The blade is segmented into a blade proper and a tapered root section that forms an independent attachment component. This segmented design allows the blade to be detached and replaced while the root section remains with the hub, enabling easy maintenance while maintaining reliable connections through the tapered form-fitting geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The blade root employs a tapered conical geometry that creates a form-fitting connection with the hub. This curved, tapered surface provides natural alignment and secure engagement, ensuring reliable force transmission while allowing for easy assembly and disassembly of the blade.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Data Source

PatentEP2261113B1Propeller
Publication Date: 2014.02.19 THYSSENKRUPP MARINE SYST GMBH
  • EP2261113B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2261113B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2261113B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

It is a built-up propeller with a central support body (1) and at least two propeller blades (5) attached to it around the circumference. The cross-section of the propeller blades (5) tapers in their root region (11) closest to the support body with increasing radial distance from the support body (1). The shoe (10) receiving the root (11) of a blade (5) has a correspondingly inverted cross-sectional profile and engages the blade (5) in a form-fitting manner in the area of ​​the blade root (11). The blade shoe (10) is attached to the support body (1).