Bulk Messaging Detection Using Homoglyph and URL Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Organizations and individuals face challenges in effectively blocking unwanted and commercial bulk messages, as senders often evade filtering systems by disguising messages as person-to-person communications to avoid higher charges, necessitating advanced automated detection and enforcement methods.

Innovation Solution

A computing platform that tokenizes messages, detects homoglyphs and URLs, and uses machine learning to identify and flag spam or commercial senders, applying enforcement policies to restrict or block messages sent through improper channels, ensuring compliance with application-to-person channels for commercial messages.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional filtering and blocking systems are used to prevent unwanted messages, then some spam messages can be blocked, but senders can easily evade these systems by changing tactics and disguising messages as P2P communications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespam blocking effectivenessVSAvoidsender evasion capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts to changing spam tactics by continuously analyzing message patterns, token frequencies, and sender behaviors. The machine learning model is retrained with new data to detect evolving evasion techniques, making the filtering system responsive to adaptive threats rather than static rules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes detection parameters by analyzing multiple features including token frequency distributions, homoglyph patterns, URL characteristics, and message metadata. By monitoring changes in these parameters over time, the system detects when senders attempt to evade filtering by modifying their messaging patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If commercial senders disguise bulk messages as P2P messages to avoid higher A2P charges, then they can reduce messaging costs, but this creates unwanted commercial messages in P2P channels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessaging costVSAvoidunwanted commercial messaging
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of messages before delivery by tokenizing content, detecting homoglyphs and URLs, and evaluating against trained models to identify commercial intent. This preliminary detection prevents commercial messages from being delivered through P2P channels in the first place

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary detection layer between message submission and delivery that analyzes message characteristics and sender behavior patterns. This intermediary evaluation determines whether a message should be routed through P2P or A2P channels based on detected commercial intent rather than relying on sender declarations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If automated detection systems analyze message content using tokenization and pattern recognition, then spam and commercial messages can be identified accurately, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage classification accuracyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system segments message analysis into distinct modular components: tokenization of message content, detection of homoglyphs, URL analysis, metadata evaluation, and machine learning classification. Each component handles a specific aspect of analysis, making the overall complex system manageable through functional segmentation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces tokenization as an intermediary processing step that converts message content into standardized tokens before analysis. This intermediary representation simplifies subsequent pattern matching and machine learning operations by normalizing diverse message formats into comparable token sequences

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250106179A1Bulk Messaging Detection and Enforcement
Publication Date: 2025.03.27 LEE THOMAS
  • US20250106179A1 patent drawing
  • US20250106179A1 patent drawing
  • US20250106179A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the disclosure relate to providing commercial and/or spam messaging detection and enforcement. A computing platform may receive a plurality of text messages from a sender. It may then tokenize the plurality of text messages to yield a plurality of tokens. The computing platform may then match one or more tokens of the plurality of tokens in the plurality of text messages to one or more bulk string tokens. Next, it may detect one or more homoglyphs in the plurality of text messages, and then detect one or more URLs in the plurality of text messages. The computing platform may flag the sender based at least on the one or more matching tokens, the one or more detected homoglyphs, and the one or more detected URLs. Based on flagging the sender, the computing platform may block one or more messages from the sender.