Bulk Textured Sheeting With Pointed Structures for Lamination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for laminating materials rely on adhesives, which are expensive, messy, and prone to failure, and are not environmentally friendly, limiting the ability to create strong, lightweight laminates with custom sizes and shapes, especially for bulk materials.

Innovation Solution

A continuous process that textures bulk material sheeting using toothed knives to create raised, pointed structures for mechanical attachment, allowing for adhesive-free lamination of heterogeneous materials with customizable dimensions and patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If adhesive is used to join laminated materials, then the materials can be joined together, but the adhesive is expensive, messy, emits noxious fumes, and is prone to failure under stress

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint strengthVSAvoidnoxious fumes and mess
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the chemical bonding system (adhesive) with a mechanical bonding system (interlocking textured surfaces). The textured surfaces create physical interlocks that mechanically join the laminated materials without requiring chemical adhesives, thereby eliminating noxious fumes and mess while maintaining joint strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes the adhesive component from the lamination process entirely. By creating textured surfaces that mechanically interlock, the system eliminates the need for adhesive substances, removing the source of noxious fumes and mess from the process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Strength

If adhesive is used to join laminated materials, then the materials can be joined together, but the adhesive prevents recycling or reclamation of the lamina

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint strengthVSAvoidrecyclability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces chemical bonding with mechanical interlocking through textured surfaces. This mechanical connection can be physically separated without chemical degradation, allowing the laminated materials to be disassembled and recycled or reclaimed without the contamination that adhesive residues would cause

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Strength

If mechanical attachment is used on individual parts, then strong attachment is achieved, but the process is limited to thick steel plates and cannot be used on continuous larger scale material

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment strengthVSAvoidcontinuous production capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the mechanical attachment function into a surface texturing process that can be applied continuously to large sheets of material. Instead of attaching individual thick plates mechanically, the surface of continuous material is textured to create mechanical interlocking capability across the entire surface area, enabling continuous production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from mechanical attachment in the thickness dimension (individual thick plates) to surface-based mechanical attachment in the planar dimension (continuous sheets). The texturing process creates mechanical attachment features on the surface of continuous material, enabling scalability from individual parts to large-scale continuous production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Ease of manufacture

If individual parts are fed from a magazine with uniform size, then mechanical attachment can be provided, but size and shape variations are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical attachment capabilityVSAvoidsize and shape customization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic flexibility to the manufacturing process by enabling continuous feeding and texturing of material in various sizes and shapes. Unlike fixed magazine-fed systems, the continuous texturing process can accommodate variable material dimensions and geometries, allowing customization while maintaining mechanical attachment capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the creation of strong, lightweight laminates by forming continuous rows of pointed structures on the material surface, enhancing strength and stiffness while reducing material costs and environmental impact, and allowing for custom sizes and shapes.

Implementation Method 1

the sheeting is repeatedly impacted with toothed knives, each knife creating a row of raised and generally pointed structures on the sheeting to texture the sheeting

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical deformation: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS11858025B2Bulk textured material sheeting
Publication Date: 2024.01.02 GRIPMETAL LTD
  • US11858025B2 patent drawing
  • US11858025B2 patent drawing
  • US11858025B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process is provided for making bulk textured material sheeting. As a continuous supply of flat material sheeting is fed, the sheeting is repeatedly impacted with toothed knives, each knife creating a row of raised and generally pointed structures on the sheeting to texture the sheeting.