Bulk Substrate with Patterned Soft and Stiff Elastic Regions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current stretchable electronics face limitations in flexibility due to the need for rigid form factors in multilayer structures, leading to interfacial issues when stiff substrates are laminated onto elastomeric bases, which restricts the stretchability of devices.

Innovation Solution

A method for fabricating bulk substrates with patterned soft and stiff elastic regions directly into the material, eliminating adhered interfaces and enabling multi-modulus behavior, allowing for spatial control of properties like Young's modulus and thermal expansion, thereby enhancing strain tolerance and flexibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If stiff substrates are laminated onto elastomeric substrates to provide rigid form factor for electronic components, then the structural rigidity and stability of electronic components is improved, but interfacial issues arise and strain capacity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural rigidityVSAvoidstrain capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate is designed with spatially varying mechanical properties, containing both stiff regions (with Young's modulus >10% of bulk modulus) that provide structural rigidity for electronic components and soft-elastic regions (with Young's modulus <10% of bulk modulus) that accommodate strain. This local differentiation allows different regions to serve different functions without creating harmful interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses a composite substrate structure combining stiff and soft-elastic regions within a single continuous material matrix. This eliminates the need for laminated interfaces between dissimilar materials, thereby removing interfacial issues while maintaining both rigidity and strain capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Shape

If geometric solutions like thin-film variations are used to accommodate smaller bending radii, then the flexibility of rigid structures is improved, but stretchability remains limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebending radiusVSAvoidstretchability
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate incorporates localized soft-elastic regions that can undergo large deformations (greater than 25% strain) while stiff regions maintain their shape and provide structural support. This local quality differentiation enables the structure to achieve both small bending radii and high stretchability simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If multi-material lamination is used to create substrates with different mechanical properties, then the multi-modulus behavior is achieved, but interfacial issues manifest at intermediate and high strains

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-modulus behaviorVSAvoidinterfacial stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the stiff and soft-elastic regions into a single continuous material system rather than using separate laminated layers. This integration eliminates interfaces between dissimilar materials, thereby maintaining multi-modulus behavior while preventing interfacial issues that would otherwise manifest at intermediate and high strains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables stretchable electronic stacks to deform primarily in soft regions, maintaining device functionality despite mechanical limitations, and allows for the microfabrication of strain-intolerant components on stiff regions, improving the overall performance and flexibility of electronic devices.

Implementation Method 1

a bulk material that can exhibit multi-modulus behavior that is spatially-controlled either during the synthesis of the bulk material, or as a function of the post-polymerization modification of the bulk material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPost-polymerization modification:

Data Source

PatentUS10736212B2Substrates for stretchable electronics and method of manufacture
Publication Date: 2020.08.04 ARES MATERIALS INC
  • US10736212B2 patent drawing
  • US10736212B2 patent drawing
  • US10736212B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bulk substrate for stretchable electronics. The bulk substrate is manufactured with a process that forms a soft-elastic region of the bulk substrate. The soft-elastic region includes a strain capacity of greater than or equal to 25% and a first Young's modulus below 10% of a maximum local modulus of the bulk substrate. The process also forms a stiff-elastic region of the bulk substrate. The stiff-elastic region includes a strain capacity of less than or equal to 5% and a second Young's modulus greater than 10% of the maximum local modulus of the bulk substrate.