Bulk Synchronization for Transactional Memory Locks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In multi-threaded programs, acquiring multiple locks can be expensive and inefficient, particularly due to the need for memory barrier operations, which can lead to performance bottlenecks and incorrect program behavior, such as race conditions, especially in shared-memory environments.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of bulk synchronization techniques, including the use of read-write locks and slotted read-write locks, allows for the consolidation of memory barrier operations across multiple lock acquisitions, reducing the overhead of acquiring and releasing locks and enhancing concurrency control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If memory barrier operations are executed after every lock acquisition to ensure correct program behavior, then reliability is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to performance bottlenecks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrect program behaviorVSAvoidperformance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple individual memory barrier operations are merged into a single consolidated memory barrier operation that serves multiple lock acquisitions. The system tracks multiple locks and their associated memory barrier requirements, then executes one unified memory barrier operation that satisfies all of them, reducing the total number of expensive memory barrier executions while maintaining correct program ordering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary tracking and bookkeeping of lock acquisitions and their memory barrier requirements before executing the actual memory barrier operations. By maintaining state information about which locks have been acquired and whether their memory barriers have been executed, the system can defer and consolidate memory barrier operations rather than executing them immediately after each lock acquisition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If multiple locks are acquired individually with separate memory barrier operations, then reliability is improved through proper synchronization, but device complexity increases due to overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization correctnessVSAvoidoverhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple separate lock acquisition operations with individual memory barriers are merged into a bulk synchronization operation. The system maintains a data structure that tracks multiple locks and consolidates their memory barrier requirements into a single operation, reducing the complexity of managing multiple separate synchronization points while preserving the correctness of each individual lock acquisition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Productivity

If memory barrier operations are consolidated across multiple lock acquisitions, then productivity is improved by reducing overhead, but device complexity increases due to bulk synchronization mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveefficiencyVSAvoidbulk synchronization mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

An intermediary data structure is introduced to track lock acquisitions and manage the consolidation of memory barrier operations. This intermediary structure serves as a mediator between individual lock acquisitions and the consolidated memory barrier execution, allowing the system to maintain simplicity at the lock acquisition level while achieving efficiency gains through bulk operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If bulk synchronization is implemented to minimize memory barrier operations, then productivity is improved, but reliability may worsen due to potential race conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcurrency efficiencyVSAvoidprogram behavior correctness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The bulk synchronization mechanism incorporates feedback through tracking data structures that monitor which locks have been acquired and whether their memory barriers have been executed. This feedback mechanism ensures that the consolidated memory barrier operation correctly addresses all acquired locks before allowing subsequent operations to proceed, preventing race conditions while maintaining the efficiency benefits of bulk synchronization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8302105B2Bulk synchronization in transactional memory systems
Publication Date: 2012.10.30 ORACLE AMERICAN INC
  • US8302105B2 patent drawing
  • US8302105B2 patent drawing
  • US8302105B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for acquiring multiple software locks in bulk is disclosed. When multiple locks need to be acquired, such as for atomic transactions in transactional memory systems, the disclosed techniques may be applied to consolidate computationally expensive memory barrier operations across the lock acquisitions. A system may acquire multiple locks in bulk, at least in part, by modifying values in one or more fields of multiple locks and by then performing a memory barrier operation to ensure that the modified values in the multiple locks are visible to other application threads. The technique may be repeated for locks that the system fails to acquire during earlier iterations until all required locks are acquired. The described technique may be applied to various scenarios including static and/or dynamic transactional locking protocols.