Bumper Cross Beam Geometry for RCAR and Pendulum Test Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional bumper cross members face challenges in meeting conflicting requirements of the RCAR barrier test and pendulum impact test, risking damage to the bending beam and requiring excessive installation space, while also struggling with the less favorable geometric conditions for plastic materials.

Innovation Solution

The bumper cross member's geometry is optimized by setting back the camber of the bending beam to reduce the intrusion path and early activate crash boxes in the RCAR barrier test, and incorporating humps to absorb pendulum impact forces, thereby reducing the risk of bending beam damage and minimizing installation space.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the bending beam is given sufficient camber for the RCAR barrier test, then the crash boxes can be activated early to protect components, but the bending beam may break during deflection and requires large installation space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection of components behind bumperVSAvoidbending beam integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The bumper cross member is segmented into distinct functional zones: the bending beam with reduced camber for structural integrity, and separately positioned crash boxes for energy absorption. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function optimally without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The crash boxes are positioned to be activated early in the impact sequence, before the bending beam undergoes significant deflection. This preliminary activation of the crash boxes absorbs impact energy upfront, preventing excessive bending beam deflection and potential breakage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the bending beam is given sufficient camber for the RCAR barrier test, then the crash boxes can be activated early, but a relatively large installation space is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrash box activationVSAvoidinstallation space
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the bumper design and positioning crash boxes separately from the bending beam, the overall installation space is optimized. The crash boxes are placed at locations that minimize the required deflection space while ensuring early activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The crash boxes are positioned to activate preliminarily in the impact sequence, absorbing energy before the bending beam deflects significantly. This reduces the required deflection space and overall installation volume while maintaining reliable crash box activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Use of energy by moving object

If the bending beam geometry is optimized for the RCAR barrier test, then energy absorption is improved, but the pendulum impact test requirements may not be met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact energy absorptionVSAvoidtest compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Different local geometries are applied to different parts of the bumper cross member. The bending beam has reduced camber for RCAR test optimization, while humps are added in specific areas to maintain stiffness and meet pendulum test requirements. Each local feature is optimized for its specific functional requirement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The bumper design is segmented into regions with different geometric characteristics: the central bending beam area with reduced camber for energy absorption, and localized humps for maintaining stiffness. This allows simultaneous compliance with both test requirements through spatial differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances energy absorption and protection of vehicle components, while significantly reducing installation space requirements without compromising test compliance, particularly benefiting plastic materials by optimizing strength and flexibility.

Implementation Method 1

a non-destructive deflection of the bending beam is desired, which enables the crash boxes to be activated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the crash boxes are activated and thus prevents damage to the vehicle structure behind it

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Implementation Method 3

incorporating humps to absorb pendulum impact forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force absorption: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentEP2342099B1Bumper cross beam
Publication Date: 2012.11.28 SMP DEUTLAND
  • EP2342099B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a bumper cross beam (1) having a bumper bracket (2) and two side crash boxes (3) with a geometric structure which is adjusted to the dimensions of testing equipment.