Motor Vehicle Bumper Shell Member With Closure Plate

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current motor vehicle bumpers face challenges in achieving high energy absorption capacity, optimal deformation behavior, and lightweight construction while meeting regulatory requirements for pedestrian protection and crash performance, especially in the context of increasing electromobility where electric vehicles have softer front regions and lower resistance capacity.

Innovation Solution

A motor vehicle bumper design featuring a transverse carrier with a shell member closed by a closure plate over 70% of its length, having a W-shaped profile with a central bead that initiates deformation, and constructed from ultra-high-strength cold-forming or hot-formed steel, which enhances energy absorption and deformation behavior by selectively deforming around obstacles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If the bumper structure is made lighter to achieve weight savings, then fuel efficiency and performance improve, but the energy absorption capacity and resistance capacity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebumper weightVSAvoidenergy absorption capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transitioning from conventional steel to ultra-high-strength steel materials with tensile strengths of at least 1500 MPa. This material parameter change enables the bumper to achieve both weight reduction and enhanced energy absorption capacity, as the higher strength-to-density ratio of ultra-high-strength steel allows thinner cross-sections while maintaining or improving protective performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material strategies by combining ultra-high-strength steel components with carefully designed geometric structures including hollow sections and optimized cross-sections. This composite approach integrates material strength with structural efficiency to achieve superior energy absorption per unit weight compared to conventional solid steel designs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If the bumper structure is made more complex to improve deformation behavior and energy absorption, then crash performance improves, but manufacturing complexity and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeformation behaviorVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the bumper structure into distinct functional zones including front reinforcement sections, side impact zones, and central impact areas. Each segment is optimized with specific geometric features and material properties to handle different impact scenarios, enabling controlled deformation patterns while maintaining overall structural coherence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by varying the cross-sectional geometry, wall thickness, and material distribution at different locations along the bumper. Critical impact zones receive enhanced structural features such as increased thickness or geometric reinforcement, while less critical areas use optimized minimal designs, achieving superior deformation behavior without uniform complexity throughout

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the front region is made softer to improve pedestrian protection, then pedestrian safety improves, but the resistance capacity against stationary obstacles decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepedestrian protectionVSAvoidresistance capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by designing the bumper with progressive deformation characteristics that adapt to impact conditions. The structure features controlled collapse zones and energy absorption mechanisms that activate differently based on impact force and duration, providing softer initial contact for pedestrian safety while maintaining progressive resistance capacity for stationary obstacle impacts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes by implementing varying material densities, cross-sectional areas, and structural stiffness along the bumper length. The front region incorporates optimized geometric parameters for pedestrian interaction, while rear and central sections maintain higher resistance parameters for obstacle protection, achieving both requirements through spatial parameter variation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11505147B2Motor vehicle bumper
Publication Date: 2022.11.22 BENTELER AUTOMOBILTECHNIK GMBH
  • US11505147B2 patent drawing
  • US11505147B2 patent drawing
  • US11505147B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A motor vehicle bumper that has a transverse carrier which can be secured transversely relative to the longitudinal carriers of the motor vehicle by crash boxes. The transverse carrier has a shell member which is open toward the front side and which has a rear wall and two outer members which are both adjoined at the end side by an outwardly directed longitudinal flange. The shell member has a central longitudinal portion which is adjoined in the direction toward the two ends of the transverse carrier by a transition portion, an intermediate portion, a crash box connection portion and an end portion. The shell member is closed at least over the majority of the length thereof by a closure plate which forms the front side. In the transition portions, the shell member has a minimum depth which is less than the maximum depth in the central longitudinal portion.