Bumper Strut Deformation Points for Weight Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bumper arrangements for motor vehicles face challenges in minimizing energy or fuel consumption while maintaining stringent safety requirements for vehicle occupants during crashes.

Innovation Solution

The bumper arrangement incorporates struts with predefined deformation points, which are supported by crash boxes and a crossmember, allowing for targeted deformation and reduced weight, achieved through ductility variations or bead embodiments, enabling efficient energy absorption and improved safety without compromising safety standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If crash boxes are used to absorb energy and protect occupants, then safety is improved, but weight increases and fuel consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoccupant safetyVSAvoidbumper arrangement weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The bumper arrangement is segmented into multiple functional components: crossmember, crash boxes, and struts with predefined deformation points. This segmentation allows each component to have optimized mass and deformation characteristics, enabling weight reduction while maintaining safety through distributed energy absorption across multiple elements rather than relying solely on heavy crash boxes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The struts are designed with predefined deformation points that have specific ductility parameters different from the rest of the strut structure. This parameter change allows controlled deformation at specific locations, enabling the struts to absorb energy in a predictable manner with reduced mass compared to traditional crash box designs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If crash boxes are dimensioned to absorb crash energy, then occupant safety is improved, but energy consumption increases due to increased vehicle weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoccupant safetyVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The energy absorption function is segmented between crash boxes and struts with predefined deformation points. This allows the crash boxes to be dimensioned more lightly since they share the energy absorption task with the struts, thereby reducing overall bumper weight and associated fuel consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

By introducing struts with controlled ductility parameters and predefined deformation characteristics, the system achieves efficient energy absorption with reduced mass. The struts deform in a controlled manner at specific points, providing predictable energy dissipation that allows for lighter overall bumper construction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Weight of moving object

If additional struts with predefined deformation points are added to the bumper arrangement, then weight can be reduced and safety improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebumper arrangement weightVSAvoidbumper arrangement structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The bumper is segmented into modular components (crossmember, crash boxes, struts) that can be independently designed, manufactured, and assembled. This modularity manages complexity by allowing each component to be optimized separately while maintaining overall system simplicity through standardized connection interfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The struts incorporate predefined deformation points with specific ductility parameters, transforming a simple structural element into a controlled energy-absorbing component. This parameter modification allows the struts to provide sophisticated crash management functionality without requiring complex active control systems or multiple moving parts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design significantly reduces the overall weight of the bumper arrangement while maintaining or improving safety, allowing for controlled deformation and enhanced energy absorption, thereby minimizing fuel consumption and ensuring occupant safety during crashes.

Implementation Method 1

each crash box is then assigned at least one strut which is supported both on in each case one end of the crash box pointing away from the crossmember and/or a flange plate as well as on the crossmember, wherein the at least one strut is arranged in the longitudinal extent of the crossmember between two crash boxes and has at least one predefined deformation point

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS9393923B2Bumper arrangement for a motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2016.07.19 BENTELER AUTOMOBILTECHNIK GMBH
  • US9393923B2 patent drawing
  • US9393923B2 patent drawing
  • US9393923B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bumper arrangement for a motor vehicle having a crossmember which can be coupled to longitudinal members via crash boxes, wherein the crash boxes are arranged between the crossmember and a flange plate which is assigned to the respective crash box and which is designed to couple to a longitudinal member is provided. In this context, each crash box is assigned at least one strut which is supported both on in each case one end of the crash box pointing away from the crossmember and/or a flange plate as well as on the crossmember, wherein the at least one strut is arranged in the longitudinal extent of the crossmember between two crash boxes and has at least one predefined deformation point.