Buoyant Automatic Cleaner with Thrust Jet Downforce

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional automatic pool cleaners lack natural buoyancy, making them difficult to retrieve from pools and prone to getting stuck in complex geometries, and often require additional mechanical or electrical mechanisms for maneuvering.

Innovation Solution

Designing automatic cleaners with positive buoyancy that can naturally float to the surface for retrieval and featuring a sloped bottom surface, rotating scrub brushes, and a thrust jet that exhausts water at an acute angle to generate downforce, allowing for efficient cleaning and navigation through complex geometries without the need for elongated air hoses or mechanical repositioning mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional automatic pool cleaners are designed with negative buoyancy to remain submerged for cleaning, then cleaning effectiveness is improved, but retrieval difficulty increases and additional mechanisms are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning effectivenessVSAvoidretrieval ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the buoyancy parameter of the cleaner from negative (submerged) to positive (floating). The cleaner is designed with a buoyant body that naturally floats on water, eliminating the need for diving cells, air hoses, or complex retrieval mechanisms. When cleaning is needed, the cleaner is simply pushed underwater and will remain submerged due to its operational weight distribution, but will naturally float back to the surface when power is depleted or retrieval is desired.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If cleaners have a planar bottom surface positioned close to the pool floor for improved water intake, then cleaning efficiency is improved, but the risk of getting stuck on obstacles increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning efficiencyVSAvoidrisk of getting stuck
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the conventional planar bottom surface with a curved, rounded bottom surface. This curved geometry allows the cleaner to smoothly navigate over obstacles, steps, and complex pool/spa geometries without getting stuck. The rounded shape distributes contact forces and enables the cleaner to roll over protrusions rather than high-centering on them, significantly reducing the risk of becoming stuck while maintaining effective water intake through the curved inlet design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Extent of automation

If electrically-powered cleaners include motors, pumps, and batteries for autonomous operation, then automation level is improved, but device complexity and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous operation capabilityVSAvoidmechanical and electrical mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a simplified autonomous system where the cleaner uses its own operational components (motor and pump) to generate downforce that counteracts its natural buoyancy during cleaning. The system automatically transitions from floating mode to submerged cleaning mode when power is applied, and automatically returns to floating mode when power is depleted. This self-service approach eliminates the need for complex retrieval mechanisms, diving cells, or additional buoyancy control systems, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining autonomous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables easy retrieval and effective cleaning of pools and spas with complex geometries, reducing the risk of getting stuck and simplifying the design by eliminating the need for additional mechanical or electrical mechanisms, while maintaining efficient debris collection and movement.

Implementation Method 1

The present innovative cleaners have positive buoyancy. Accordingly, they are capable of naturally floating to the water surface when not subjected to countervailing forces.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 2

In use, therefore, operation of the motor would create down force counteracting the positive buoyancy of the cleaner. This would cause the cleaner to remain submerged within a vessel so as to perform its cleaning functions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDown force: Force

Implementation Method 3

featuring a sloped bottom surface, rotating scrub brushes, and a thrust jet that exhausts water at an acute angle to generate downforce

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThrust: Reaction (physics)

Data Source

PatentEP3510216B1Buoyant automatic cleaners
Publication Date: 2024.11.06 ZODIAC POOL SYST
  • EP3510216B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3510216B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3510216B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Autonomous, mobile cleaners for water-containing vessels such as swimming pools and spas are detailed. The cleaners are especially useful for cleaning spas, although they may function adequately in connection with certain other vessels as well. They may be designed and constructed in particular to avoid high centering so as not to become stuck when encountering obstacles within the spas or other vessels.