Buried Casing Stub Location via Vector Magnetometry
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Locating buried casing stubs is challenging due to interference from other magnetic materials and the inability to determine the depth of the stub using scalar magnetometers, which often results in inaccurate mapping and difficulty in intervention operations.
Innovation Solution
A method utilizing a vector magnetometer to measure and model the magnetic field in a target region, combined with a total station for precise positioning and an accelerometer for inclination determination, allows for the identification and removal of ferrous objects and generation of a model to accurately locate the casing stub, including depth determination.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If a scalar magnetometer is used to map magnetic anomalies in the target region, then the location of magnetic anomalies can be identified, but the depth to the buried casing stub cannot be determined and other magnetic materials cause interference
Solution Approach 1:
The patent transitions from using a scalar magnetometer to a vector magnetometer, changing the measurement parameters from single-component magnetic field strength to three-component magnetic field vectors. This parameter change enables depth determination through gravitational gradient measurements and provides directional information to distinguish the casing stub from other magnetic materials.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces a gravitational gradient sensor as an intermediary measurement device that works in conjunction with the vector magnetometer. This intermediary sensor provides additional gravitational field data that helps distinguish the magnetic anomaly source from other ferrous materials and enables depth calculation.
2Reliability
If a scalar magnetometer is used to map magnetic anomalies, then magnetic perturbation distribution can be visualized, but interference from other magnetic materials such as ferrous debris and well equipment cannot be distinguished
Solution Approach 1:
The patent changes from scalar to vector magnetometer measurements, providing three-component magnetic field data instead of a single magnitude value. This additional directional information allows differentiation between the casing stub anomaly and interference from other magnetic materials through directional analysis and gravitational gradient correlation.
3Loss of time
If records of the well are used to locate the casing stub, then location data may be available, but the records may not include surface location data requiring operator to find the buried casing stub
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces manual record searching and physical exploration with an automated vector magnetometer survey system. The system automatically maps the magnetic field, processes the data through gravitational gradient analysis, and generates a hot spot map that directly identifies the casing stub location, eliminating the need for manual record review and physical searching.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
This approach enhances the accuracy of locating buried casing stubs by distinguishing between the casing stub's magnetic anomaly and other ferrous materials, enabling precise intervention operations by providing detailed magnetic field modeling and depth information.
Implementation Method 1
measuring the magnetic field at the survey point with the vector magnetometer
Implementation Method 2
an accelerometer, and the method may further comprise determining the inclination of the casing stub locator with the accelerometer
Data Source
AI summary
A method for locating a buried casing stub may include a) identifying a target region, b) providing at each of a plurality of survey points in the target region a casing stub locator that includes a vector magnetometer, c) measuring the magnetic field at each of the survey points using the vector magnetometer so as to generate a plurality of magnetic field measurements, d) using the magnetic field measurements to generate a model of the magnetic field of the target region, e) fitting the model generated in step d) to a selected model of a magnetic anomaly created by the casing stub so as to generate model fit information (MFI), and f) locating the casing stub using the MFI. At each survey point, an expected Earth magnetic field can be subtracted from the measured magnetic field. A total station can measure the position and/or the azimuth of the package.


