Magnetic Mapping of Buried and Submerged Structures With Simulation Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mapping methods for buried or submerged structures using magnetic data lack precision, are prone to anomalies, require human intervention for correction, and do not automatically validate or compare with simulation data.

Innovation Solution

A method involving spatialized magnetic data acquisition, provisional segment generation, volume creation around points, simulation of magnetic values, comparison with measured data, and selection of points with the best scores to generate a coherent magnetic map.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If automated simulation-based validation is implemented, then mapping precision and anomaly detection improve, but computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeolocation precisionVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-generating simulation data representing expected magnetic field conditions before actual measurement validation. This allows the system to have reference models ready for comparison, enabling faster validation of measured data without performing complex simulations in real-time during the mapping process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by creating simulated copies of expected magnetic field patterns through numerical models. These simulated data sets serve as reference models that can be directly compared against actual measurements, avoiding the need to perform full physical simulations during validation and significantly reducing computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If manual operator intervention is used to correct anomalies, then mapping accuracy improves, but processing time and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemapping accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the system to automatically detect, validate, and correct mapping anomalies through comparison with simulation data. The system independently identifies inconsistencies between measured and simulated magnetic fields, and can automatically adjust or flag problematic data points without requiring manual operator intervention for each anomaly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies feedback by continuously comparing measured magnetic field data against simulated reference models and using the discrepancies to automatically validate or reject data points. This closed-loop validation process provides real-time feedback on data quality, enabling automatic correction of anomalies and reducing the need for manual review while maintaining high mapping accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If simulation data comparison is performed for all measurement points, then validation accuracy improves, but computational load and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by performing simulation data comparison selectively at specific locations rather than uniformly across all measurement points. The system identifies regions where validation is most critical (such as areas with anomalies or uncertain geolocation) and applies intensive simulation comparison only there, while using lighter validation methods in stable, well-understood regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by performing full simulation-based validation only on a subset of measurement points that are most critical for validation, such as points showing anomalies or located in uncertain zones. For other points with clear, unambiguous data, the system uses simplified validation or accepts data without full simulation comparison, thereby reducing overall computational energy while maintaining validation accuracy where it matters most.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Improves accuracy by automating the correction of anomalies and ensuring consistency in geolocation without human intervention, allowing multiple hypothesis testing for precise mapping.

Implementation Method 1

acquiring spatialized magnetic data obtained by magnetic sensors at different measurement points in the area to be controlled, after injecting a current into the structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentEP4600703A1Mapping method for state control and/or geolocalisation of a buried, semi-buried or submerged structure comprising a metal or magnetic material
Publication Date: 2025.08.13 SKIPPER NDT
  • EP4600703A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4600703A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4600703A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a mapping method for monitoring the condition and/or geolocation of a buried, semi-buried or submerged structure comprising a metallic or magnetic material, in which the following are carried out: a step of acquiring spatialized magnetic data obtained by magnetic sensors at different measurement points in the area to be monitored, after injecting a current into the structure, a step of generating a temporary segment, comprising a set of temporary points, and a volume around each temporary point, the volume comprising a cloud of points, and a simulation step, for each point of each volume, making it possible to calculate the simulated magnetic values of the points in the cloud at all or part of the measurement points.